1 # Copyright 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
3 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
6 # (at your option) any later version.
8 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
11 # GNU General Public License for more details.
13 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14 # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15 # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
17 # This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
19 # This contains tests for GDB's use of RTTI information. This stems
20 # from a bug reported in PR gdb/488 and other places, which leads to
21 # statements like 'warning: can't find class named 'C::D', as given by
22 # C++ RTTI'. It arises from GDB not knowing about classes that are
23 # defined in namespaces.
25 # NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: I suspect it could arise from nested class
26 # issues, too, and even once we fix that, there might be situations
27 # (involving templates, in particular) where this problem triggers
28 # because GDB and GCC have different ideas what a class is called.
34 if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
37 # test running programs
43 set srcfile1 "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.cc"
44 set objfile1 "${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.o"
45 set srcfile2 "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.cc"
46 set objfile2 "${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.o"
47 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
49 # gdb_get_line_number needs this to be called srcfile. Except that it
50 # gets confused if the directories are included. :-(
51 set srcfile "${testfile}1.cc"
53 if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile1}" "${objfile1}" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
54 gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
57 if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile2}" "${objfile2}" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
58 gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
61 if { [gdb_compile "${objfile1} ${objfile2}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
62 gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
65 if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
71 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
75 if ![runto_main] then {
76 perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
80 # First, run to after we've constructed the object:
82 gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "main-constructs-done"]
83 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in main"
85 gdb_test_multiple "print *e1" "print *e1" {
86 -re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n1::D1'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
88 kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
90 -re "warning: can't find class named `n1::D1', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
92 kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
94 -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n1::Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
97 -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
98 # NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: If code is compiled by GCC2, we
99 # don't print the warning (for no particular reason), but we
100 # still call the class via the wrong name; PR gdb/57 is our
101 # catch-all PR for nested type problems.
102 kfail "gdb/57" "print *e1"
106 # NOTE: carlton/2004-01-14: This test with an "<incomplete type>"
107 # message because, within rtt1.cc, GDB has no way of knowing that the
108 # class is called 'n2::D2' instead of just 'D2'. This is an artifical
109 # test case, though: if we were using these classes in a more
110 # substantial way, G++ would emit more debug info. As is, I don't
111 # think there's anything that GDB can do about this case until G++
112 # starts emitting DW_TAG_namespace info; this should arrive with GCC
115 gdb_test_multiple "print *e2" "print *e2" {
116 -re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n2::D2'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
117 # gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
118 kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
120 -re "warning: can't find class named `n2::D2', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
122 kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
124 -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = <incomplete type>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
125 kfail "gdb/1511" "print *e2"
127 -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
130 -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
131 kfail "gdb/57" "print *e2"
135 # Now we test the hack that's been implemented to get around some
136 # instances of PR gdb/1511.
138 gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func-constructs-done"]
139 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func"
141 gdb_test "print *obj" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}"
143 gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func3-constructs-done"]
144 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func3"
146 gdb_test "print *obj3" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::C2> = .*}"