before submitting code. If you are submitting a driver, also read
Documentation/SubmittingDrivers.
-
+Many of these steps describe the default behavior of the git version
+control system; if you use git to prepare your patches, you'll find much
+of the mechanical work done for you, though you'll still need to prepare
+and document a sensible set of patches.
--------------------------------------------
SECTION 1 - CREATING AND SENDING YOUR CHANGE
1) "diff -up"
------------
-Use "diff -up" or "diff -uprN" to create patches.
+Use "diff -up" or "diff -uprN" to create patches. git generates patches
+in this form by default; if you're using git, you can skip this section
+entirely.
All changes to the Linux kernel occur in the form of patches, as
generated by diff(1). When creating your patch, make sure to create it
belong in a patch submission. Make sure to review your patch -after-
generated it with diff(1), to ensure accuracy.
-If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you may want to look into
-splitting them into individual patches which modify things in
-logical stages. This will facilitate easier reviewing by other
-kernel developers, very important if you want your patch accepted.
-There are a number of scripts which can aid in this:
-
-Quilt:
-http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt
+If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you need to split them into
+individual patches which modify things in logical stages; see section
+#3. This will facilitate easier reviewing by other kernel developers,
+very important if you want your patch accepted.
-Andrew Morton's patch scripts:
-http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/patch-scripts.tar.gz
-Instead of these scripts, quilt is the recommended patch management
-tool (see above).
+If you're using git, "git rebase -i" can help you with this process. If
+you're not using git, quilt <http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt>
+is another popular alternative.
This benefits both the patch merger(s) and reviewers. Some reviewers
probably didn't even receive earlier versions of the patch.
+Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
+instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
+to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
+its behaviour.
+
If the patch fixes a logged bug entry, refer to that bug entry by
-number and URL.
+number and URL. If the patch follows from a mailing list discussion,
+give a URL to the mailing list archive; use the https://lkml.kernel.org/
+redirector with a Message-Id, to ensure that the links cannot become
+stale.
+
+However, try to make your explanation understandable without external
+resources. In addition to giving a URL to a mailing list archive or
+bug, summarize the relevant points of the discussion that led to the
+patch as submitted.
If you want to refer to a specific commit, don't just refer to the
SHA-1 ID of the commit. Please also include the oneline summary of
If you are going to include a diffstat after the "---" marker, please
use diffstat options "-p 1 -w 70" so that filenames are listed from
the top of the kernel source tree and don't use too much horizontal
-space (easily fit in 80 columns, maybe with some indentation).
+space (easily fit in 80 columns, maybe with some indentation). (git
+generates appropriate diffstats by default.)
See more details on the proper patch format in the following
references.
----------------------
Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp).
- <http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt>
+ <http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt>
Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format".
<http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html>
<http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-05.html>
NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
- <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112112749912944&w=2>
+ <https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
<http://users.sosdg.org/~qiyong/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle>
OSDN Git Service
