* the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK,
* which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock
* situation.
+ *
+ * Except for ww_mutex, in that case the chain walk must already deal
+ * with spurious cycles, see the comments at [3] and [6].
*/
- if (owner == task)
+ if (owner == task && !(build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx))
return -EDEADLK;
raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock);
* for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y)
* - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
*/
- if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
- !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter) ||
- vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+ if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() ||
+ !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
res = false;
break;
}