This reverts commit
d91f2438d881514e4a923fd786dbd94b764a9440.
The intent of issue_seq is to distinguish between mds->client messages that
(re)create the cap and those that do not, which means we should _only_ be
updating that value in the create paths. By updating it in handle_cap_grant,
we reset it to zero, which then breaks release.
The larger question is what workload/problem made me think it should be
updated here...
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
{
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
int mds = session->s_mds;
{
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
int mds = session->s_mds;
- unsigned seq = le32_to_cpu(grant->seq);
- unsigned issue_seq = le32_to_cpu(grant->issue_seq);
+ int seq = le32_to_cpu(grant->seq);
int newcaps = le32_to_cpu(grant->caps);
int issued, implemented, used, wanted, dirty;
u64 size = le64_to_cpu(grant->size);
int newcaps = le32_to_cpu(grant->caps);
int issued, implemented, used, wanted, dirty;
u64 size = le64_to_cpu(grant->size);
int revoked_rdcache = 0;
int queue_invalidate = 0;
int revoked_rdcache = 0;
int queue_invalidate = 0;
- dout("handle_cap_grant inode %p cap %p mds%d seq %u/%u %s\n",
- inode, cap, mds, seq, issue_seq, ceph_cap_string(newcaps));
+ dout("handle_cap_grant inode %p cap %p mds%d seq %d %s\n",
+ inode, cap, mds, seq, ceph_cap_string(newcaps));
dout(" size %llu max_size %llu, i_size %llu\n", size, max_size,
inode->i_size);
dout(" size %llu max_size %llu, i_size %llu\n", size, max_size,
inode->i_size);
- cap->issue_seq = issue_seq;
/* file layout may have changed */
ci->i_layout = grant->layout;
/* file layout may have changed */
ci->i_layout = grant->layout;