s390x/pci: don't fence interpreted devices without MSI-X

Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough
devices, so let's let these in.  This will allow, for example, ISM
devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is
available and being used.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220902172737.170349-5-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
index 156051e..816d17a 100644 (file)
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
@@ -881,6 +881,10 @@ static int s390_pci_msix_init(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
 
 static void s390_pci_msix_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
 {
+    if (pbdev->msix.entries == 0) {
+        return;
+    }
+
     memory_region_del_subregion(&pbdev->iommu->mr, &pbdev->msix_notify_mr);
     object_unparent(OBJECT(&pbdev->msix_notify_mr));
 }
@@ -1093,7 +1097,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
             pbdev->interp = false;
         }
 
-        if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) {
+        if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) {
             error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory "
                        "in the S390 architecture");
             return;