When we iterate over ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut, there's no reason to
start at index 0 which always contains the value 0. 0 is not a valid
link rate.
This change should have no real effect but is a small cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191218143416.v3.2.Id445d0057bedcb0a190009e0706e9254c2fd48eb@changeid
/* set DP data rate */
dp_rate_mhz = ((bit_rate_mhz / pdata->dsi->lanes) * DP_CLK_FUDGE_NUM) /
DP_CLK_FUDGE_DEN;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++)
+ for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++)
if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] > dp_rate_mhz)
break;