OSDN Git Service

sched/numa: Evaluate move once per node
authorSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:02:43 +0000 (22:32 +0530)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:41:06 +0000 (11:41 +0200)
task_numa_compare() helps choose the best CPU to move or swap the
selected task. To achieve this task_numa_compare() is called for every
CPU in the node. Currently it evaluates if the task can be moved/swapped
for each of the CPUs. However the move evaluation is mostly independent
of the CPU. Evaluating the move logic once per node, provides scope for
simplifying task_numa_compare().

Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS  LAST_PATCH  WITH_PATCH  %CHANGE
16    25705.2     25058.2     -2.51
1     74433       72950       -1.99

Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS  LAST_PATCH  WITH_PATCH  %CHANGE
8     96589.6     105930      9.670
1     181830      178624      -1.76

(numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5)
Testcase       Time:         Min         Max         Avg      StdDev
numa01.sh      Real:      440.65      941.32      758.98      189.17
numa01.sh       Sys:      183.48      320.07      258.42       50.09
numa01.sh      User:    37384.65    71818.14    60302.51    13798.96
numa02.sh      Real:       61.24       65.35       62.49        1.49
numa02.sh       Sys:       16.83       24.18       21.40        2.60
numa02.sh      User:     5219.59     5356.34     5264.03       49.07
numa03.sh      Real:      822.04      912.40      873.55       37.35
numa03.sh       Sys:      118.80      140.94      132.90        7.60
numa03.sh      User:    62485.19    70025.01    67208.33     2967.10
numa04.sh      Real:      690.66      872.12      778.49       65.44
numa04.sh       Sys:      459.26      563.03      494.03       42.39
numa04.sh      User:    51116.44    70527.20    58849.44     8461.28
numa05.sh      Real:      418.37      562.28      525.77       54.27
numa05.sh       Sys:      299.45      481.00      392.49       64.27
numa05.sh      User:    34115.09    41324.02    39105.30     2627.68

Testcase       Time:         Min         Max         Avg      StdDev   %Change
numa01.sh      Real:      516.14      892.41      739.84      151.32   2.587%
numa01.sh       Sys:      153.16      192.99      177.70       14.58   45.42%
numa01.sh      User:    39821.04    69528.92    57193.87    10989.48   5.435%
numa02.sh      Real:       60.91       62.35       61.58        0.63   1.477%
numa02.sh       Sys:       16.47       26.16       21.20        3.85   0.943%
numa02.sh      User:     5227.58     5309.61     5265.17       31.04   -0.02%
numa03.sh      Real:      739.07      917.73      795.75       64.45   9.776%
numa03.sh       Sys:       94.46      136.08      109.48       14.58   21.39%
numa03.sh      User:    57478.56    72014.09    61764.48     5343.69   8.813%
numa04.sh      Real:      442.61      715.43      530.31       96.12   46.79%
numa04.sh       Sys:      224.90      348.63      285.61       48.83   72.97%
numa04.sh      User:    35836.84    47522.47    40235.41     3985.26   46.26%
numa05.sh      Real:      386.13      489.17      434.94       43.59   20.88%
numa05.sh       Sys:      144.29      438.56      278.80      105.78   40.77%
numa05.sh      User:    33255.86    36890.82    34879.31     1641.98   12.11%

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/sched/fair.c

index 14c3fdd..b10e066 100644 (file)
@@ -1580,9 +1580,8 @@ static bool load_too_imbalanced(long src_load, long dst_load,
  * be exchanged with the source task
  */
 static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
-                             long taskimp, long groupimp)
+                             long taskimp, long groupimp, bool maymove)
 {
-       struct rq *src_rq = cpu_rq(env->src_cpu);
        struct rq *dst_rq = cpu_rq(env->dst_cpu);
        struct task_struct *cur;
        long src_load, dst_load;
@@ -1603,97 +1602,73 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
        if (cur == env->p)
                goto unlock;
 
+       if (!cur) {
+               if (maymove || imp > env->best_imp)
+                       goto assign;
+               else
+                       goto unlock;
+       }
+
        /*
         * "imp" is the fault differential for the source task between the
         * source and destination node. Calculate the total differential for
         * the source task and potential destination task. The more negative
-        * the value is, the more rmeote accesses that would be expected to
+        * the value is, the more remote accesses that would be expected to
         * be incurred if the tasks were swapped.
         */
-       if (cur) {
-               /* Skip this swap candidate if cannot move to the source CPU: */
-               if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->src_cpu, &cur->cpus_allowed))
-                       goto unlock;
+       /* Skip this swap candidate if cannot move to the source cpu */
+       if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->src_cpu, &cur->cpus_allowed))
+               goto unlock;
 
+       /*
+        * If dst and source tasks are in the same NUMA group, or not
+        * in any group then look only at task weights.
+        */
+       if (cur->numa_group == env->p->numa_group) {
+               imp = taskimp + task_weight(cur, env->src_nid, dist) -
+                     task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid, dist);
                /*
-                * If dst and source tasks are in the same NUMA group, or not
-                * in any group then look only at task weights.
+                * Add some hysteresis to prevent swapping the
+                * tasks within a group over tiny differences.
                 */
-               if (cur->numa_group == env->p->numa_group) {
-                       imp = taskimp + task_weight(cur, env->src_nid, dist) -
-                             task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid, dist);
-                       /*
-                        * Add some hysteresis to prevent swapping the
-                        * tasks within a group over tiny differences.
-                        */
-                       if (cur->numa_group)
-                               imp -= imp/16;
-               } else {
-                       /*
-                        * Compare the group weights. If a task is all by
-                        * itself (not part of a group), use the task weight
-                        * instead.
-                        */
-                       if (cur->numa_group)
-                               imp += group_weight(cur, env->src_nid, dist) -
-                                      group_weight(cur, env->dst_nid, dist);
-                       else
-                               imp += task_weight(cur, env->src_nid, dist) -
-                                      task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid, dist);
-               }
+               if (cur->numa_group)
+                       imp -= imp / 16;
+       } else {
+               /*
+                * Compare the group weights. If a task is all by itself
+                * (not part of a group), use the task weight instead.
+                */
+               if (cur->numa_group && env->p->numa_group)
+                       imp += group_weight(cur, env->src_nid, dist) -
+                              group_weight(cur, env->dst_nid, dist);
+               else
+                       imp += task_weight(cur, env->src_nid, dist) -
+                              task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid, dist);
        }
 
-       if (imp <= env->best_imp && moveimp <= env->best_imp)
+       if (imp <= env->best_imp)
                goto unlock;
 
-       if (!cur) {
-               /* Is there capacity at our destination? */
-               if (env->src_stats.nr_running <= env->src_stats.task_capacity &&
-                   !env->dst_stats.has_free_capacity)
-                       goto unlock;
-
-               goto balance;
-       }
-
-       /* Balance doesn't matter much if we're running a task per CPU: */
-       if (imp > env->best_imp && src_rq->nr_running == 1 &&
-                       dst_rq->nr_running == 1)
+       if (maymove && moveimp > imp && moveimp > env->best_imp) {
+               imp = moveimp - 1;
+               cur = NULL;
                goto assign;
+       }
 
        /*
         * In the overloaded case, try and keep the load balanced.
         */
-balance:
-       load = task_h_load(env->p);
+       load = task_h_load(env->p) - task_h_load(cur);
+       if (!load)
+               goto assign;
+
        dst_load = env->dst_stats.load + load;
        src_load = env->src_stats.load - load;
 
-       if (moveimp > imp && moveimp > env->best_imp) {
-               /*
-                * If the improvement from just moving env->p direction is
-                * better than swapping tasks around, check if a move is
-                * possible. Store a slightly smaller score than moveimp,
-                * so an actually idle CPU will win.
-                */
-               if (!load_too_imbalanced(src_load, dst_load, env)) {
-                       imp = moveimp - 1;
-                       cur = NULL;
-                       goto assign;
-               }
-       }
-
-       if (imp <= env->best_imp)
-               goto unlock;
-
-       if (cur) {
-               load = task_h_load(cur);
-               dst_load -= load;
-               src_load += load;
-       }
-
        if (load_too_imbalanced(src_load, dst_load, env))
                goto unlock;
 
+assign:
        /*
         * One idle CPU per node is evaluated for a task numa move.
         * Call select_idle_sibling to maybe find a better one.
@@ -1709,7 +1684,6 @@ balance:
                local_irq_enable();
        }
 
-assign:
        task_numa_assign(env, cur, imp);
 unlock:
        rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1718,15 +1692,27 @@ unlock:
 static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
                                long taskimp, long groupimp)
 {
+       long src_load, dst_load, load;
+       bool maymove = false;
        int cpu;
 
+       load = task_h_load(env->p);
+       dst_load = env->dst_stats.load + load;
+       src_load = env->src_stats.load - load;
+
+       /*
+        * If the improvement from just moving env->p direction is better
+        * than swapping tasks around, check if a move is possible.
+        */
+       maymove = !load_too_imbalanced(src_load, dst_load, env);
+
        for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(env->dst_nid)) {
                /* Skip this CPU if the source task cannot migrate */
                if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &env->p->cpus_allowed))
                        continue;
 
                env->dst_cpu = cpu;
-               task_numa_compare(env, taskimp, groupimp);
+               task_numa_compare(env, taskimp, groupimp, maymove);
        }
 }