types are needed to compute the return type of a defaulted operator<=>.
This raises the question of what to do if return type deduction fails.
The standard doesn't say, and implementations vary, so for now reject
that case eagerly to keep our options open.
"return type of defaulted 'operator<=>' cannot be deduced because "
"return type %2 of three-way comparison for %select{|member|base class}0 %1 "
"is not a standard comparison category type">;
+def err_defaulted_comparison_cannot_deduce_undeduced_auto : Error<
+ "return type of defaulted 'operator<=>' cannot be deduced because "
+ "three-way comparison for %select{|member|base class}0 %1 "
+ "has a deduced return type and is not yet defined">;
+def note_defaulted_comparison_cannot_deduce_undeduced_auto : Note<
+ "%select{|member|base class}0 %1 declared here">;
def note_defaulted_comparison_cannot_deduce_callee : Note<
"selected 'operator<=>' for %select{|member|base class}0 %1 declared here">;
def err_incorrect_defaulted_comparison_constexpr : Error<
if (OO == OO_Spaceship && FD->getReturnType()->isUndeducedAutoType()) {
if (auto *BestFD = Best->Function) {
+ // If any callee has an undeduced return type, deduce it now.
+ // FIXME: It's not clear how a failure here should be handled. For
+ // now, we produce an eager diagnostic, because that is forward
+ // compatible with most (all?) other reasonable options.
+ if (BestFD->getReturnType()->isUndeducedType() &&
+ S.DeduceReturnType(BestFD, FD->getLocation(),
+ /*Diagnose=*/false)) {
+ // Don't produce a duplicate error when asked to explain why the
+ // comparison is deleted: we diagnosed that when initially checking
+ // the defaulted operator.
+ if (Diagnose == NoDiagnostics) {
+ S.Diag(
+ FD->getLocation(),
+ diag::err_defaulted_comparison_cannot_deduce_undeduced_auto)
+ << Subobj.Kind << Subobj.Decl;
+ S.Diag(
+ Subobj.Loc,
+ diag::note_defaulted_comparison_cannot_deduce_undeduced_auto)
+ << Subobj.Kind << Subobj.Decl;
+ S.Diag(BestFD->getLocation(),
+ diag::note_defaulted_comparison_cannot_deduce_callee)
+ << Subobj.Kind << Subobj.Decl;
+ }
+ return Result::deleted();
+ }
if (auto *Info = S.Context.CompCategories.lookupInfoForType(
BestFD->getCallResultType())) {
R.Category = Info->Kind;
// Check that the above mechanism works.
template void f<std::strong_ordering, weak>(); // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
+
+ std::strong_ordering x = A<strong>() <=> A<strong>();
+}
+
+namespace PR44723 {
+ // Make sure we trigger return type deduction for a callee 'operator<=>'
+ // before inspecting its return type.
+ template<int> struct a {
+ friend constexpr auto operator<=>(a const &lhs, a const &rhs) {
+ return std::strong_ordering::equal;
+ }
+ };
+ struct b {
+ friend constexpr auto operator<=>(b const &, b const &) = default;
+ a<0> m_value;
+ };
+ std::strong_ordering cmp_b = b() <=> b();
+
+ struct c {
+ auto operator<=>(const c&) const&; // expected-note {{selected 'operator<=>' for base class 'c' declared here}}
+ };
+ struct d : c { // expected-note {{base class 'c' declared here}}
+ friend auto operator<=>(const d&, const d&) = default; // #d
+ // expected-error@#d {{return type of defaulted 'operator<=>' cannot be deduced because three-way comparison for base class 'c' has a deduced return type and is not yet defined}}
+ // expected-warning@#d {{implicitly deleted}}
+ };
+ auto c::operator<=>(const c&) const& { // #c
+ return std::strong_ordering::equal;
+ }
+ // expected-error@+1 {{overload resolution selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
+ std::strong_ordering cmp_d = d() <=> d();
+ // expected-note@#c 2{{candidate}}
+ // expected-note@#d {{candidate function has been implicitly deleted}}
}
namespace BadDeducedType {