[CPUFREQ] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR

Looks like dbs_timer() is very careful wrt per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info),
and it doesn't need the help of WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index d60bcb9..8d053f5 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -432,9 +432,6 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
        /* We want all CPUs to do sampling nearly on same jiffy */
        int delay = usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate);
 
-       /* Permit rescheduling of this work item */
-       work_release(work);
-
        delay -= jiffies % delay;
 
        if (lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu) < 0)
@@ -473,7 +470,7 @@ static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
        dbs_info->enable = 1;
        ondemand_powersave_bias_init();
        dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
-       INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
+       INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
        queue_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, kondemand_wq, &dbs_info->work,
                              delay);
 }