drm/i915: Fix erroneous conversion to u8

adj was defined as u8. The issue is last_adj can be negative and adj is
initialized with:

  adj = dev_priv->rps.last_adj;

and we were also happily doing things like:

  if (adj < 0)

(thank static analysers!)

v2: Make new_delay an int in case we overflow the u8 in the intermediate
    computations. new_delay will get clamped at the end anyway. (Ville)

Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 87abe86..f0d24db 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1327,10 +1327,10 @@ static u32 vlv_c0_residency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  * @dev_priv: DRM device private
  *
  */
-static u32 vlv_calc_delay_from_C0_counters(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+static int vlv_calc_delay_from_C0_counters(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
        u32 residency_C0_up = 0, residency_C0_down = 0;
-       u8 new_delay, adj;
+       int new_delay, adj;
 
        dev_priv->rps.ei_interrupt_count++;