OSDN Git Service

drm/amd/powerplay: use virtual msg index to replace asic-related msg index
authorKevin Wang <Kevin1.Wang@amd.com>
Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:23:23 +0000 (16:23 +0800)
committerAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:03:56 +0000 (15:03 -0500)
Using virtual msg index is able to support all ASIC specific message values on
one smu upper layer.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <Kevin1.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v11_0.c

index c0ff55f..ff1120a 100644 (file)
@@ -81,13 +81,17 @@ static int smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(struct smu_context *smu)
 static int smu_v11_0_send_msg(struct smu_context *smu, uint16_t msg)
 {
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret = 0, index = 0;
+
+       index = smu_msg_get_index(smu, msg);
+       if (index < 0)
+               return index;
 
        smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
 
        WREG32_SOC15(MP1, 0, mmMP1_SMN_C2PMSG_90, 0);
 
-       smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, msg);
+       smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, (uint16_t)index);
 
        ret = smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
 
@@ -105,7 +109,11 @@ smu_v11_0_send_msg_with_param(struct smu_context *smu, uint16_t msg,
 {
 
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret = 0, index = 0;
+
+       index = smu_msg_get_index(smu, msg);
+       if (index < 0)
+               return index;
 
        ret = smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
        if (ret)
@@ -116,7 +124,7 @@ smu_v11_0_send_msg_with_param(struct smu_context *smu, uint16_t msg,
 
        WREG32_SOC15(MP1, 0, mmMP1_SMN_C2PMSG_82, param);
 
-       smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, msg);
+       smu_v11_0_send_msg_without_waiting(smu, (uint16_t)index);
 
        ret = smu_v11_0_wait_for_response(smu);
        if (ret)