BranchRelaxation: Fix handling of blocks with multiple conditional

branches

Looping over all terminators exposed AArch64 tests hitting
an assert from analyzeBranch failing. I believe these cases
were miscompiled before.

e.g.
  fcmp s0, s1
  b.ne LBB0_1
  b.vc LBB0_2
  b LBB0_2
LBB0_1:
  ; Large block
LBB0_2:
 ; ...

Both of the individual conditional branches need to
be expanded, since neither can reach the final block.

Split the original block into ones which analyzeBranch
will be able to understand.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64BranchRelaxation.cpp b/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64BranchRelaxation.cpp
index 9d2577e..92130a1 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64BranchRelaxation.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64BranchRelaxation.cpp
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ using namespace llvm;
 #define DEBUG_TYPE "aarch64-branch-relax"
 
 STATISTIC(NumSplit, "Number of basic blocks split");
-STATISTIC(NumRelaxed, "Number of conditional branches relaxed");
+STATISTIC(NumConditionalRelaxed, "Number of conditional branches relaxed");
 
 namespace llvm {
 void initializeAArch64BranchRelaxationPass(PassRegistry &);
@@ -477,13 +477,43 @@ bool AArch64BranchRelaxation::relaxBranchInstructions() {
     if (J == MBB.end())
       continue;
 
-    MachineInstr &MI = *J;
-    if (MI.isConditionalBranch() && !isBlockInRange(MI, *getDestBlock(MI))) {
-      fixupConditionalBranch(MI);
-      ++NumRelaxed;
-      Changed = true;
+    MachineBasicBlock::iterator Next;
+    for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator J = MBB.getFirstTerminator();
+         J != MBB.end(); J = Next) {
+      Next = std::next(J);
+      MachineInstr &MI = *J;
+
+      if (MI.isConditionalBranch()) {
+        MachineBasicBlock *DestBB = getDestBlock(MI);
+        if (!isBlockInRange(MI, *DestBB)) {
+          if (Next != MBB.end() && Next->isConditionalBranch()) {
+            // If there are multiple conditional branches, this isn't an
+            // analyzable block. Split later terminators into a new block so
+            // each one will be analyzable.
+
+            MachineBasicBlock *NewBB = splitBlockBeforeInstr(*Next);
+            NewBB->transferSuccessors(&MBB);
+            MBB.addSuccessor(NewBB);
+            MBB.addSuccessor(DestBB);
+
+            // Cleanup potential unconditional branch to successor block.
+            NewBB->updateTerminator();
+            MBB.updateTerminator();
+          } else {
+            fixupConditionalBranch(MI);
+            ++NumConditionalRelaxed;
+          }
+
+          Changed = true;
+
+          // This may have modified all of the terminators, so start over.
+          Next = MBB.getFirstTerminator();
+        }
+
+      }
     }
   }
+
   return Changed;
 }
 

diff --git a/test/CodeGen/AArch64/branch-relax-bcc.ll b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/branch-relax-bcc.ll
index d73236c..636acf0 100644 (file)
--- a/test/CodeGen/AArch64/branch-relax-bcc.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/branch-relax-bcc.ll
@@ -1,16 +1,22 @@
 ; RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64-apple-darwin -aarch64-bcc-offset-bits=3 < %s | FileCheck %s
 
 ; CHECK-LABEL: invert_bcc:
-; CHECK:       fcmp s0, s1
-; CHECK-NEXT:  b.ne [[BB1:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:  b.vs [[BB2:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:  b [[BB2]]
+; CHECK:      fcmp s0, s1
+; CHECK-NEXT: b.eq [[JUMP_BB1:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: b [[JUMP_BB2:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
 
-; CHECK: [[BB1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[JUMP_BB1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: b [[BB1:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
+
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[JUMP_BB2]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: b.vc [[BB2:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: b [[BB1]]
+
+; CHECK: [[BB2]]: ; %bb2
 ; CHECK: mov w{{[0-9]+}}, #9
 ; CHECK: ret
 
-; CHECK: [[BB2]]:
+; CHECK: [[BB1]]: ; %bb1
 ; CHECK: mov w{{[0-9]+}}, #42
 ; CHECK: ret