target/ppc: Fix test on mmu_model in hreg_compute_hflags_value()

POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE is not a mask and should not be tested with a
bitwise AND operator.

It went unnoticed because it only impacts the 601 CPU implementation
for which we don't have a known firmware image.

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220124081609.3672341-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

diff --git a/target/ppc/helper_regs.c b/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
index 7dca585..5b12cb0 100644 (file)
--- a/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
+++ b/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static uint32_t hreg_compute_hflags_value(CPUPPCState *env)
      */
     unsigned immu_idx, dmmu_idx;
     dmmu_idx = msr & (1 << MSR_PR) ? 0 : 1;
-    if (env->mmu_model & POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE) {
+    if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE ||
+        env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206) {
         dmmu_idx |= msr & (1 << MSR_GS) ? 4 : 0;
         immu_idx = dmmu_idx;
         immu_idx |= msr & (1 << MSR_IS) ? 2 : 0;
@@ -237,7 +238,8 @@ int hreg_store_msr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong value, int alter_hv)
         ((value >> MSR_DR) & 1) != msr_dr) {
         cpu_interrupt_exittb(cs);
     }
-    if ((env->mmu_model & POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE) &&
+    if ((env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE ||
+         env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206) &&
         ((value >> MSR_GS) & 1) != msr_gs) {
         cpu_interrupt_exittb(cs);
     }