Be consistent about spelling. LGPL says "License" not "Licence", so go

with that.  (Spotted by Xride on irc.)

diff --git a/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html b/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html
index 631944f..8cc1be2 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html
+++ b/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html
@@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ How could it be smaller and not suck?</a></h2>
 
     No, you do not need to give away your application source code just because
     you use uClibc and/or run on Linux.  uClibc is licensed under the <a
-    href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html">Lesser GPL</a> licence, just
-    like the GNU C library (glibc).  Please read this licence, or have a lawyer
-    read this licence if you have any questions.  Here is my brief summary...
+    href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html">Lesser GPL</a> license, just
+    like the GNU C library (glibc).  Please read this license, or have a lawyer
+    read this license if you have any questions.  Here is my brief summary...
     Using shared libraries makes complying with the license easy.  You can
     distribute a closed source application which is linked with an unmodified
     uClibc shared library.  In this case, you do not need to give away any