It won't be efficient to dequeue request one by one from sw queue,
but we have to do that when queue is busy for better merge performance.
This patch takes the Exponential Weighted Moving Average(EWMA) to figure
out if queue is busy, then only dequeue request one by one from sw queue
when queue is busy.
Fixes:
b347689ffbca ("blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue")
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reported-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
return 0;
}
+static int hctx_dispatch_busy_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data;
+
+ seq_printf(m, "%u\n", hctx->dispatch_busy);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void *ctx_rq_list_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
__acquires(&ctx->lock)
{
{"queued", 0600, hctx_queued_show, hctx_queued_write},
{"run", 0600, hctx_run_show, hctx_run_write},
{"active", 0400, hctx_active_show},
+ {"dispatch_busy", 0400, hctx_dispatch_busy_show},
{},
};
}
} else if (has_sched_dispatch) {
blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
- } else if (q->mq_ops->get_budget) {
- /*
- * If we need to get budget before queuing request, we
- * dequeue request one by one from sw queue for avoiding
- * to mess up I/O merge when dispatch runs out of resource.
- *
- * TODO: get more budgets, and dequeue more requests in
- * one time.
- */
+ } else if (hctx->dispatch_busy) {
+ /* dequeue request one by one from sw queue if queue is busy */
blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
} else {
blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
return true;
}
+#define BLK_MQ_DISPATCH_BUSY_EWMA_WEIGHT 8
+#define BLK_MQ_DISPATCH_BUSY_EWMA_FACTOR 4
+/*
+ * Update dispatch busy with the Exponential Weighted Moving Average(EWMA):
+ * - EWMA is one simple way to compute running average value
+ * - weight(7/8 and 1/8) is applied so that it can decrease exponentially
+ * - take 4 as factor for avoiding to get too small(0) result, and this
+ * factor doesn't matter because EWMA decreases exponentially
+ */
+static void blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool busy)
+{
+ unsigned int ewma;
+
+ if (hctx->queue->elevator)
+ return;
+
+ ewma = hctx->dispatch_busy;
+
+ if (!ewma && !busy)
+ return;
+
+ ewma *= BLK_MQ_DISPATCH_BUSY_EWMA_WEIGHT - 1;
+ if (busy)
+ ewma += 1 << BLK_MQ_DISPATCH_BUSY_EWMA_FACTOR;
+ ewma /= BLK_MQ_DISPATCH_BUSY_EWMA_WEIGHT;
+
+ hctx->dispatch_busy = ewma;
+}
+
#define BLK_MQ_RESOURCE_DELAY 3 /* ms units */
/*
else if (needs_restart && (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE))
blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, BLK_MQ_RESOURCE_DELAY);
+ blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, true);
return false;
- }
+ } else
+ blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, false);
/*
* If the host/device is unable to accept more work, inform the
struct sbitmap ctx_map;
struct blk_mq_ctx *dispatch_from;
+ unsigned int dispatch_busy;
- struct blk_mq_ctx **ctxs;
unsigned int nr_ctx;
+ struct blk_mq_ctx **ctxs;
spinlock_t dispatch_wait_lock;
wait_queue_entry_t dispatch_wait;