(*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VP] = UnitsAndLanes(CVI_XLANE, 1);
(*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VP_VS] = UnitsAndLanes(CVI_XLANE, 2);
(*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VS] = UnitsAndLanes(CVI_SHIFT, 1);
- (*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VINLANESAT] = UnitsAndLanes(CVI_SHIFT, 1);
+ (*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VINLANESAT] =
+ (CPU == "hexagonv60" || CPU == "hexagonv61" || CPU == "hexagonv61v1") ?
+ UnitsAndLanes(CVI_SHIFT, 1) :
+ UnitsAndLanes(CVI_XLANE | CVI_SHIFT | CVI_MPY0 | CVI_MPY1, 1);
(*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VM_LD] =
UnitsAndLanes(CVI_XLANE | CVI_SHIFT | CVI_MPY0 | CVI_MPY1, 1);
(*TUL)[HexagonII::TypeCVI_VM_TMP_LD] = UnitsAndLanes(CVI_NONE, 0);
--- /dev/null
+# RUN: not llvm-mc -mv60 -mhvx -filetype=asm %s 2>%t; FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-V60-ERROR <%t
+# RUN: llvm-mc -mv62 -mhvx -filetype=asm %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// for this a v60+/hvx instruction sequence, make sure fails with v60
+// but passes with v62. this is because this instruction uses different
+// itinerary between v60 and v62
+{
+ v0.h=vsat(v5.w,v9.w)
+ v16.h=vsat(v6.w,v26.w)
+}
+# CHECK-V60-ERROR: rror: invalid instruction packet: slot error
+# CHECK: v0.h = vsat(v5.w,v9.w)
+# CHECK: v16.h = vsat(v6.w,v26.w)