A customer reported that running
qemu-img convert -t none -O qcow2 -f qcow2 input.qcow2 output.qcow2
fails for them with the following error message when the images are
stored on a GPFS file system :
qemu-img: error while writing sector 0: Invalid argument
After analyzing the strace output, it seems like the problem is in
handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(): The call to fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
returns EINVAL, which can apparently happen if the file system has
a different idea of the granularity of the operation. It's arguably
a bug in GPFS, since the PUNCH_HOLE mode should not result in EINVAL
according to the man-page of fallocate(), but the file system is out
there in production and so we have to deal with it. In commit
294682cc3a
("block: workaround for unaligned byte range in fallocate()") we also
already applied the a work-around for the same problem to the earlier
fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE) call, so do it now similar with the
PUNCH_HOLE call. But instead of silently catching and returning
-ENOTSUP (which causes the caller to fall back to writing zeroes),
let's rather inform the user once about the buggy file system and
try the other fallback instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <
20210527172020.847617-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
return ret;
}
s->has_fallocate = false;
+ } else if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+ /*
+ * Some file systems like older versions of GPFS do not like un-
+ * aligned byte ranges, and return EINVAL in such a case, though
+ * they should not do it according to the man-page of fallocate().
+ * Warn about the bad filesystem and try the final fallback instead.
+ */
+ warn_report_once("Your file system is misbehaving: "
+ "fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) returned EINVAL. "
+ "Please report this bug to your file sytem "
+ "vendor.");
} else if (ret != -ENOTSUP) {
return ret;
} else {