Fix a segfault caused by under-allocating an array.

diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog
index f5bc32f..1d2150c 100644 (file)
--- a/bfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/bfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2000-09-21  Alan Modra  <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
+
+       * elf32-hppa.c (elf32_hppa_check_relocs): Fix weak sym handling in
+       currently unused RELATIVE_DYNAMIC_RELOCS code.
+       (hppa_discard_copies): Likewise.
+       (elf32_hppa_size_stubs): Size `input_list' array correctly.
+
 2000-09-20  Alan Modra  <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
 
        * section.c (bfd_get_unique_section_name): Return NULL if

diff --git a/bfd/elf32-hppa.c b/bfd/elf32-hppa.c
index 37edff8..c800e5c 100644 (file)
--- a/bfd/elf32-hppa.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-hppa.c
@@ -1537,8 +1537,7 @@ elf32_hppa_check_relocs (abfd, info, sec, relocs)
                  || is_absolute_reloc (r_type)
                  || (h != NULL
                      && ((h->elf.elf_link_hash_flags
-                          & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) == 0
-                         || h->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak)))
+                          & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) == 0)))
 #endif
              )
            {
@@ -2096,7 +2095,7 @@ hppa_discard_copies (h, inf)
      any relocs.  */
   if (eh->elf.dynindx == -1
       || ((eh->elf.elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) != 0
-         && eh->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_defweak
+         && !is_absolute_reloc (r_type)
          && info->symbolic))
     {
       for (s = eh->reloc_entries; s != NULL; s = s->next)
@@ -2441,8 +2440,15 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
   hplink->add_stub_section = add_stub_section;
   hplink->layout_sections_again = layout_sections_again;
 
-  /* Count the number of input BFDs and find the top section id.  */
-  for (input_bfd = info->input_bfds, bfd_count = 0, top_id = 0;
+  /* Count the number of input BFDs, find the top input section id,
+     and the top output section index.  We can't use output_bfd
+     section_count here to find the top output section index as some
+     sections may have been removed, and _bfd_strip_section_from_output
+     doesn't renumber the indices.  Also, sections created by the
+     linker aren't counted, and to make matters worse, aren't even on
+     the output_bfd section list.  We could probably just ignore
+     sections created by the linker, but this way seems safer.  */
+  for (input_bfd = info->input_bfds, bfd_count = 0, top_id = 0, top_index = 0;
        input_bfd != NULL;
        input_bfd = input_bfd->link_next)
     {
@@ -2453,6 +2459,10 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
        {
          if (top_id < section->id)
            top_id = section->id;
+         if (section->output_section != NULL
+             && section->output_section->owner == output_bfd
+             && top_index < section->output_section->index)
+           top_index = section->output_section->index;
        }
     }
 
@@ -2461,18 +2471,7 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
   if (hplink->stub_group == NULL)
     return false;
 
-  /* Now make a list of input sections for each output section.
-     We can't use output_bfd->section_count here as some sections may
-     have been removed, and _bfd_strip_section_from_output doesn't
-     renumber the indices.  Sections may also be re-ordered, so the
-     last section index isn't necessarily the biggest.  */
-  for (section = output_bfd->sections, top_index = 0;
-       section != NULL;
-       section = section->next)
-    {
-      if (top_index < section->index)
-       top_index = section->index;
-    }
+  /* Now make a list of input sections for each output section.  */
   input_list
     = (asection **) bfd_zmalloc (sizeof (asection *) * (top_index + 1));
   if (input_list == NULL)
@@ -2506,7 +2505,7 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
      .fini output sections respectively, because glibc splits the
      _init and _fini functions into multiple parts.  Putting a stub in
      the middle of a function is not a good idea.  */
-  list = input_list + output_bfd->section_count;
+  list = input_list + top_index;
   while (list-- != input_list)
     {
       asection *tail = *list;