bpf: generate better lowering code for certain select/setcc instructions

Currently, for code like below,
===
  inner_map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(outer_map, &port_key);
  if (!inner_map) {
    inner_map = &fallback_map;
  }
===
the compiler generates (pseudo) code like the below:
===
  I1: r1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(outer_map, &port_key);
  I2: r2 = 0
  I3: if (r1 == r2)
  I4:   r6 = &fallback_map
  I5: ...
===

During kernel verification process, After I1, r1 holds a state
map_ptr_or_null. If I3 condition is not taken
(path [I1, I2, I3, I5]), supposedly r1 should become map_ptr.
Unfortunately, kernel does not recognize this pattern
and r1 remains map_ptr_or_null at insn I5. This will cause
verificaiton failure later on.

Kernel, however, is able to recognize pattern "if (r1 == 0)"
properly and give a map_ptr state to r1 in the above case.

LLVM here generates suboptimal code which causes kernel verification
failure. This patch fixes the issue by changing BPF insn pattern
matching and lowering to generate proper codes if the righthand
parameter of the above condition is a constant. A test case
is also added.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308080 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
index cc7a7c3..c6e4f07 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
@@ -515,8 +515,10 @@ BPFTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter(MachineInstr &MI,
                                                MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
   const TargetInstrInfo &TII = *BB->getParent()->getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
   DebugLoc DL = MI.getDebugLoc();
+  bool isSelectOp = MI.getOpcode() == BPF::Select;
+  bool isSelectRiOp = MI.getOpcode() == BPF::Select_Ri;
 
-  assert(MI.getOpcode() == BPF::Select && "Unexpected instr type to insert");
+  assert((isSelectOp || isSelectRiOp) && "Unexpected instr type to insert");
 
   // To "insert" a SELECT instruction, we actually have to insert the diamond
   // control-flow pattern.  The incoming instruction knows the destination vreg
@@ -548,48 +550,40 @@ BPFTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter(MachineInstr &MI,
 
   // Insert Branch if Flag
   unsigned LHS = MI.getOperand(1).getReg();
-  unsigned RHS = MI.getOperand(2).getReg();
   int CC = MI.getOperand(3).getImm();
+  int NewCC;
   switch (CC) {
   case ISD::SETGT:
-    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(BPF::JSGT_rr))
-        .addReg(LHS)
-        .addReg(RHS)
-        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+    NewCC = isSelectOp ? BPF::JSGT_rr : BPF::JSGT_ri;
     break;
   case ISD::SETUGT:
-    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(BPF::JUGT_rr))
-        .addReg(LHS)
-        .addReg(RHS)
-        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+    NewCC = isSelectOp ? BPF::JUGT_rr : BPF::JUGT_ri;
     break;
   case ISD::SETGE:
-    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(BPF::JSGE_rr))
-        .addReg(LHS)
-        .addReg(RHS)
-        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+    NewCC = isSelectOp ? BPF::JSGE_rr : BPF::JSGE_ri;
     break;
   case ISD::SETUGE:
-    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(BPF::JUGE_rr))
-        .addReg(LHS)
-        .addReg(RHS)
-        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+    NewCC = isSelectOp ? BPF::JUGE_rr : BPF::JUGE_ri;
     break;
   case ISD::SETEQ:
-    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(BPF::JEQ_rr))
-        .addReg(LHS)
-        .addReg(RHS)
-        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+    NewCC = isSelectOp ? BPF::JEQ_rr : BPF::JEQ_ri;
     break;
   case ISD::SETNE:
-    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(BPF::JNE_rr))
-        .addReg(LHS)
-        .addReg(RHS)
-        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+    NewCC = isSelectOp ? BPF::JNE_rr : BPF::JNE_ri;
     break;
   default:
     report_fatal_error("unimplemented select CondCode " + Twine(CC));
   }
+  if (isSelectOp)
+    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(NewCC))
+        .addReg(LHS)
+        .addReg(MI.getOperand(2).getReg())
+        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
+  else
+    BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(NewCC))
+        .addReg(LHS)
+        .addImm(MI.getOperand(2).getImm())
+        .addMBB(Copy1MBB);
 
   // Copy0MBB:
   //  %FalseValue = ...

diff --git a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td
index 5ad7772..f683578 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td
+++ b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td
@@ -460,6 +460,11 @@ let usesCustomInserter = 1 in {
                       "# Select PSEUDO $dst = $lhs $imm $rhs ? $src : $src2",
                       [(set i64:$dst,
                        (BPFselectcc i64:$lhs, i64:$rhs, (i64 imm:$imm), i64:$src, i64:$src2))]>;
+  def Select_Ri : Pseudo<(outs GPR:$dst),
+                      (ins GPR:$lhs, i64imm:$rhs, i64imm:$imm, GPR:$src, GPR:$src2),
+                      "# Select PSEUDO $dst = $lhs $imm $rhs ? $src : $src2",
+                      [(set i64:$dst,
+                       (BPFselectcc i64:$lhs, (i64 imm:$rhs), (i64 imm:$imm), i64:$src, i64:$src2))]>;
 }
 
 // load 64-bit global addr into register

diff --git a/test/CodeGen/BPF/select_ri.ll b/test/CodeGen/BPF/select_ri.ll
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c4ac376
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/BPF/select_ri.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpf -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s
+;
+; Source file:
+; int b, c;
+; int test() {
+;   int a = b;
+;   if (a)
+;     a = c;
+;   return a;
+; }
+@b = common local_unnamed_addr global i32 0, align 4
+@c = common local_unnamed_addr global i32 0, align 4
+
+; Function Attrs: norecurse nounwind readonly
+define i32 @test() local_unnamed_addr #0 {
+entry:
+  %0 = load i32, i32* @b, align 4
+  %tobool = icmp eq i32 %0, 0
+  %1 = load i32, i32* @c, align 4
+  %. = select i1 %tobool, i32 0, i32 %1
+; CHECK:  r1 = <MCOperand Expr:(b)>ll
+; CHECK:  r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0)
+; CHECK:  if r1 == 0 goto
+  ret i32 %.
+}
+
+attributes #0 = { norecurse nounwind readonly }

diff --git a/test/CodeGen/BPF/setcc.ll b/test/CodeGen/BPF/setcc.ll
index 294c493..7e20814 100644 (file)
--- a/test/CodeGen/BPF/setcc.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/BPF/setcc.ll
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ define i16 @sccweqand(i16 %a, i16 %b) nounwind {
   ret i16 %t3
 }
 ; CHECK-LABEL: sccweqand:
-; CHECK: if r1 == r2
+; CHECK: if r1 == 0
 
 define i16 @sccwneand(i16 %a, i16 %b) nounwind {
   %t1 = and i16 %a, %b
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ define i16 @sccwneand(i16 %a, i16 %b) nounwind {
   ret i16 %t3
 }
 ; CHECK-LABEL: sccwneand:
-; CHECK: if r1 != r2
+; CHECK: if r1 != 0
 
 define i16 @sccwne(i16 %a, i16 %b) nounwind {
   %t1 = icmp ne i16 %a, %b