OSDN Git Service

drm/i915/execlists: Tweak virtual unsubmission
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:30:12 +0000 (21:30 +0100)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:51:17 +0000 (12:51 +0100)
Since commit e2144503bf3b ("drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from
overtaking each other on preemption") we have restricted requests to run
on their chosen engine across preemption events. We can take this
restriction into account to know that we will want to resubmit those
requests onto the same physical engine, and so can shortcircuit the
virtual engine selection process and keep the request on the same
engine during unwind.

References: e2144503bf3b ("drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from overtaking each other on preemption")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramlingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191013203012.25208-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c

index a07baeb..ee21307 100644 (file)
@@ -847,7 +847,6 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
        list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(rq, rn,
                                         &engine->active.requests,
                                         sched.link) {
-               struct intel_engine_cs *owner;
 
                if (i915_request_completed(rq))
                        continue; /* XXX */
@@ -862,8 +861,7 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
                 * engine so that it can be moved across onto another physical
                 * engine as load dictates.
                 */
-               owner = rq->hw_context->engine;
-               if (likely(owner == engine)) {
+               if (likely(rq->execution_mask == engine->mask)) {
                        GEM_BUG_ON(rq_prio(rq) == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID);
                        if (rq_prio(rq) != prio) {
                                prio = rq_prio(rq);
@@ -874,6 +872,8 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
                        list_move(&rq->sched.link, pl);
                        active = rq;
                } else {
+                       struct intel_engine_cs *owner = rq->hw_context->engine;
+
                        /*
                         * Decouple the virtual breadcrumb before moving it
                         * back to the virtual engine -- we don't want the
index 437f9fc..b8a5457 100644 (file)
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp)
        rq->gem_context = ce->gem_context;
        rq->engine = ce->engine;
        rq->ring = ce->ring;
+       rq->execution_mask = ce->engine->mask;
 
        rcu_assign_pointer(rq->timeline, tl);
        rq->hwsp_seqno = tl->hwsp_seqno;
@@ -671,7 +672,6 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp)
        rq->batch = NULL;
        rq->capture_list = NULL;
        rq->flags = 0;
-       rq->execution_mask = ALL_ENGINES;
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb);