sfc: fix boolreturn.cocci warning and rename function

check_fcs() was returning bool as 0/1, which was a sign that the sense
 of the function was unclear: false was good, which doesn't really match
 a name like 'check_$thing'.  So rename it to ef100_has_fcs_error(), and
 use proper booleans in the return statements.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c
index 012925e..85207ac 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ bool ef100_rx_buf_hash_valid(const u8 *prefix)
        return PREFIX_FIELD(prefix, RSS_HASH_VALID);
 }
 
-static bool check_fcs(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
+static bool ef100_has_fcs_error(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
 {
        u16 rxclass;
        u8 l2status;
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ static bool check_fcs(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
 
        if (likely(l2status == ESE_GZ_RH_HCLASS_L2_STATUS_OK))
                /* Everything is ok */
-               return 0;
+               return false;
 
        if (l2status == ESE_GZ_RH_HCLASS_L2_STATUS_FCS_ERR)
                channel->n_rx_eth_crc_err++;
-       return 1;
+       return true;
 }
 
 void __ef100_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void __ef100_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
 
        prefix = (u32 *)(eh - ESE_GZ_RX_PKT_PREFIX_LEN);
 
-       if (check_fcs(channel, prefix) &&
+       if (ef100_has_fcs_error(channel, prefix) &&
            unlikely(!(efx->net_dev->features & NETIF_F_RXALL)))
                goto out;