Though crypto_cfg.reserve is an unused field, let me
initialize the structure in order to make coverity happy.
*** CID
1365923: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT)
/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c: 851 in virtio_crypto_get_config()
845 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.mac_algo_h, c->conf.mac_algo_h);
846 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.aead_algo, c->conf.aead_algo);
847 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.max_cipher_key_len, c->conf.max_cipher_key_len);
848 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.max_auth_key_len, c->conf.max_auth_key_len);
849 stq_le_p(&crypto_cfg.max_size, c->conf.max_size);
850
>>> CID
1365923: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT)
>>> Using uninitialized value "crypto_cfg". Field "crypto_cfg.reserve"
is uninitialized when calling "memcpy".
[Note: The source code implementation of the function
has been overridden by a builtin model.]
851 memcpy(config, &crypto_cfg, c->config_size);
852 }
853
Rported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
static void virtio_crypto_get_config(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t *config)
{
VirtIOCrypto *c = VIRTIO_CRYPTO(vdev);
- struct virtio_crypto_config crypto_cfg;
+ struct virtio_crypto_config crypto_cfg = {};
/*
* Virtio-crypto device conforms to VIRTIO 1.0 which is always LE,