commit
8f9cfeed3eae86c70d3b04445a6f2036b27b6304 upstream.
when gsmtty_remove put dlci, it will cause memory leak if dlci->port's refcount is zero.
So we do the cleanup work in .cleanup callback instead.
dlci will be last put in two call chains.
1) gsmld_close -> gsm_cleanup_mux -> gsm_dlci_release -> dlci_put
2) gsmld_remove -> dlci_put
so there is a race. the memory leak depends on the race.
In call chain 2. we hit the memory leak. below comment tells.
release_tty -> tty_driver_remove_tty -> gsmtty_remove -> dlci_put -> tty_port_destructor (WARN_ON(port->itty) and return directly)
|
tty->port->itty = NULL;
|
tty_kref_put ---> release_one_tty -> gsmtty_cleanup (added by our patch)
So our patch fix the memory leak by doing the cleanup work after tty core did.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
Fixes:
dfabf7ffa30585
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
return gsmtty_modem_update(dlci, encode);
}
-static void gsmtty_remove(struct tty_driver *driver, struct tty_struct *tty)
+static void gsmtty_cleanup(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct gsm_dlci *dlci = tty->driver_data;
struct gsm_mux *gsm = dlci->gsm;
dlci_put(dlci);
dlci_put(gsm->dlci[0]);
mux_put(gsm);
- driver->ttys[tty->index] = NULL;
}
/* Virtual ttys for the demux */
.tiocmget = gsmtty_tiocmget,
.tiocmset = gsmtty_tiocmset,
.break_ctl = gsmtty_break_ctl,
- .remove = gsmtty_remove,
+ .cleanup = gsmtty_cleanup,
};