OSDN Git Service

sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt()
authorQais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:27:17 +0000 (13:27 +0000)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:57:27 +0000 (12:57 +0100)
When RT Capacity Aware support was added, the logic in select_task_rq_rt
was modified to force a search for a fitting CPU if the task currently
doesn't run on one.

But if the search failed, and the search was only triggered to fulfill
the fitness request; we could end up selecting a new CPU unnecessarily.

Fix this and re-instate the original behavior by ensuring we bail out
in that case.

This behavior change only affected asymmetric systems that are using
util_clamp to implement capacity aware. None asymmetric systems weren't
affected.

LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200218041620.GD28029@codeaurora.org/
Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
kernel/sched/rt.c

index 55a4a50..f0071fa 100644 (file)
@@ -1475,6 +1475,13 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
                int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
 
                /*
+                * Bail out if we were forcing a migration to find a better
+                * fitting CPU but our search failed.
+                */
+               if (!test && target != -1 && !rt_task_fits_capacity(p, target))
+                       goto out_unlock;
+
+               /*
                 * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
                 * not running a lower priority task.
                 */
@@ -1482,6 +1489,8 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
                    p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr)
                        cpu = target;
        }
+
+out_unlock:
        rcu_read_unlock();
 
 out: