The rationale is that we already have the length of the string to
duplicate (from doing the malloc()), and memcpy() should then always be
faster than strcpy() (or at least as fast).
#ifdef WANT_WIDE
libc_hidden_proto(wcslen)
-libc_hidden_proto(wcscpy)
# define Wstrdup wcsdup
# define Wstrlen wcslen
-# define Wstrcpy wcscpy
#else
libc_hidden_proto(strdup)
libc_hidden_proto(strlen)
-libc_hidden_proto(strcpy)
# define Wstrdup strdup
# define Wstrlen strlen
-# define Wstrcpy strcpy
#endif
+libc_hidden_proto(memcpy)
Wchar *Wstrdup(register const Wchar *s1)
{
register Wchar *s;
+ register size_t l = (Wstrlen(s1) + 1) * sizeof(Wchar);
- if ((s = malloc((Wstrlen(s1) + 1) * sizeof(Wchar))) != NULL) {
- Wstrcpy(s, s1);
+ if ((s = malloc(l)) != NULL) {
+ memcpy(s, s1, l);
}
return s;