mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Fix spelling mistake "candiates" -> candidates

There are several spelling mistakes in variable names and in a dev_warn
message. Fix these.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211027130812.426373-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
index 1f8a3c0..c2dd29e 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
@@ -442,14 +442,14 @@ static inline u8 dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(struct dw_mci *host)
        return sample;
 }
 
-static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
+static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candidates)
 {
        const u8 iter = 8;
        u8 __c;
        s8 i, loc = -1;
 
        for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
-               __c = ror8(candiates, i);
+               __c = ror8(candidates, i);
                if ((__c & 0xc7) == 0xc7) {
                        loc = i;
                        goto out;
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
        }
 
        for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
-               __c = ror8(candiates, i);
+               __c = ror8(candidates, i);
                if ((__c & 0x83) == 0x83) {
                        loc = i;
                        goto out;
@@ -466,11 +466,11 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
 
        /*
         * If there is no cadiates value, then it needs to return -EIO.
-        * If there are candiates values and don't find bset clk sample value,
-        * then use a first candiates clock sample value.
+        * If there are candidates values and don't find bset clk sample value,
+        * then use a first candidates clock sample value.
         */
        for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
-               __c = ror8(candiates, i);
+               __c = ror8(candidates, i);
                if ((__c & 0x1) == 0x1) {
                        loc = i;
                        goto out;
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
        struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
        struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
        struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
-       u8 start_smpl, smpl, candiates = 0;
+       u8 start_smpl, smpl, candidates = 0;
        s8 found;
        int ret = 0;
 
@@ -496,18 +496,18 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
                smpl = dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(host);
 
                if (!mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL))
-                       candiates |= (1 << smpl);
+                       candidates |= (1 << smpl);
 
        } while (start_smpl != smpl);
 
-       found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candiates);
+       found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candidates);
        if (found >= 0) {
                dw_mci_exynos_set_clksmpl(host, found);
                priv->tuned_sample = found;
        } else {
                ret = -EIO;
                dev_warn(&mmc->class_dev,
-                       "There is no candiates value about clksmpl!\n");
+                       "There is no candidates value about clksmpl!\n");
        }
 
        return ret;