#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x1000 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */
#define SD_OVERLAP 0x2000 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */
#define SD_NUMA 0x4000 /* cross-node balancing */
+#define SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES 0x8000 /* Domain members share capacity state */
/*
* Increase resolution of cpu_capacity calculations
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY |
SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY |
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
- SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)) {
+ SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN |
+ SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES)) {
if (sd->groups != sd->groups->next)
return 0;
}
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY |
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
SD_PREFER_SIBLING |
- SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN);
+ SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN |
+ SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES);
if (nr_node_ids == 1)
pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
}
* SD_NUMA - describes NUMA topologies
* SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN - describes shared power domain
* SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY - describes mixed capacity topologies
+ * SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES - describes shared capacity states
*
* Odd one out, which beside describing the topology has a quirk also
* prescribes the desired behaviour that goes along with it:
SD_NUMA | \
SD_ASYM_PACKING | \
SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY | \
- SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)
+ SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN | \
+ SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES)
static struct sched_domain *
sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,