}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);
+/*
+ * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
+ * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPT.
+ *
+ * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPT, any
+ * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
+ * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
+ * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to
+ * occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online
+ * when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds some
+ * overhead: RCU still operates correctly.
+ */
+static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
+ return rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
+ might_sleep(); /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
+ preempt_disable();
+ ret = num_online_cpus() <= 1;
+ preempt_enable();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * synchronize_rcu - wait until a grace period has elapsed.
+ *
+ * Control will return to the caller some time after a full grace
+ * period has elapsed, in other words after all currently executing RCU
+ * read-side critical sections have completed. Note, however, that
+ * upon return from synchronize_rcu(), the caller might well be executing
+ * concurrently with new RCU read-side critical sections that began while
+ * synchronize_rcu() was waiting. RCU read-side critical sections are
+ * delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.
+ * In addition, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption, or
+ * softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
+ * sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
+ * and NMI handlers.
+ *
+ * Note that this guarantee implies further memory-ordering guarantees.
+ * On systems with more than one CPU, when synchronize_rcu() returns,
+ * each CPU is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier since
+ * the end of its last RCU read-side critical section whose beginning
+ * preceded the call to synchronize_rcu(). In addition, each CPU having
+ * an RCU read-side critical section that extends beyond the return from
+ * synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier
+ * after the beginning of synchronize_rcu() and before the beginning of
+ * that RCU read-side critical section. Note that these guarantees include
+ * CPUs that are offline, idle, or executing in user mode, as well as CPUs
+ * that are executing in the kernel.
+ *
+ * Furthermore, if CPU A invoked synchronize_rcu(), which returned
+ * to its caller on CPU B, then both CPU A and CPU B are guaranteed
+ * to have executed a full memory barrier during the execution of
+ * synchronize_rcu() -- even if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but
+ * again only if the system has more than one CPU).
+ */
+void synchronize_rcu(void)
+{
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
+ if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
+ return;
+ if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
+ synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+ else
+ wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
+
/**
* get_state_synchronize_rcu - Snapshot current RCU state
*
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
}
-/*
- * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
- * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPT.
- *
- * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPT, any
- * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
- * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
- * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to
- * occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online
- * when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds some
- * overhead: RCU still operates correctly.
- */
-static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
-{
- int ret;
-
- if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
- return true;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
- return false;
- might_sleep(); /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
- preempt_disable();
- ret = num_online_cpus() <= 1;
- preempt_enable();
- return ret;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
/*
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
}
-/**
- * synchronize_rcu - wait until a grace period has elapsed.
- *
- * Control will return to the caller some time after a full grace
- * period has elapsed, in other words after all currently executing RCU
- * read-side critical sections have completed. Note, however, that
- * upon return from synchronize_rcu(), the caller might well be executing
- * concurrently with new RCU read-side critical sections that began while
- * synchronize_rcu() was waiting. RCU read-side critical sections are
- * delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.
- * In addition, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption, or
- * softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
- * sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
- * and NMI handlers.
- *
- * Note that this guarantee implies further memory-ordering guarantees.
- * On systems with more than one CPU, when synchronize_rcu() returns,
- * each CPU is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier since
- * the end of its last RCU read-side critical section whose beginning
- * preceded the call to synchronize_rcu(). In addition, each CPU having
- * an RCU read-side critical section that extends beyond the return from
- * synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier
- * after the beginning of synchronize_rcu() and before the beginning of
- * that RCU read-side critical section. Note that these guarantees include
- * CPUs that are offline, idle, or executing in user mode, as well as CPUs
- * that are executing in the kernel.
- *
- * Furthermore, if CPU A invoked synchronize_rcu(), which returned
- * to its caller on CPU B, then both CPU A and CPU B are guaranteed
- * to have executed a full memory barrier during the execution of
- * synchronize_rcu() -- even if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but
- * again only if the system has more than one CPU).
- */
-void synchronize_rcu(void)
-{
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
- lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
- lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
- if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
- return;
- if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
- synchronize_rcu_expedited();
- else
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
-
/*
* Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
* critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
}
}
-/* PREEMPT=n implementation of synchronize_rcu(). */
-void synchronize_rcu(void)
-{
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
- lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
- lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
- if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
- return;
- if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
- synchronize_rcu_expedited();
- else
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
-
/*
* Because preemptible RCU does not exist, tasks cannot possibly exit
* while in preemptible RCU read-side critical sections.
OSDN Git Service
