2003-01-17 David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>

	* gdb.c++/demangle.exp (test_lucid_style_demangling): KFAIL test
	corresponding to PR c++/945.
	Update copyright.

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index edd216f..7629586 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 2003-01-17  David Carlton  <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
 
+       * gdb.c++/demangle.exp (test_lucid_style_demangling): KFAIL test
+       corresponding to PR c++/945.
+       Update copyright.
+
+2003-01-17  David Carlton  <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
+
        * gdb.c++/inherit.exp (test_print_mi_members): KFAIL tests
        corresponding to PR c++/68.
 

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/demangle.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/demangle.exp
index 45a89bd..7bd9fc5 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/demangle.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/demangle.exp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright (C) 1992, 1997, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright (C) 1992, 1997, 1999, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -694,7 +694,10 @@ proc test_lucid_style_demangling {} {
     # GDB 930701 gets into an infinite loop.
     # GDB 930727 says "Can't demangle".
     # What is the correct demangling?  FIXME.
-    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
+
+    # NOTE: carlton/2003-01-17: No, don't FIXME, just obsolete lucid.
+    # I'm KFAILing this rather than deleting it for form's sake.
+    setup_kfail "gdb/945" "*-*-*"
     test_demangling_exact "lucid: __vtbl__3foo__vt_cc_main_" ""
 
     test_demangling_exact "lucid: abs__F7complex" "abs(complex)"