From: Richard Henderson Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:45:00 +0000 (+0200) Subject: tcg/ppc: Use atom_and_align_for_opc X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1bac4697199dd9aa5d8d0e3c56d0ea52b2bd0fa1;p=qmiga%2Fqemu.git tcg/ppc: Use atom_and_align_for_opc Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc index b62a163014..b5c49895f3 100644 --- a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc +++ b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc @@ -2015,6 +2015,7 @@ static bool tcg_out_qemu_st_slow_path(TCGContext *s, TCGLabelQemuLdst *lb) typedef struct { TCGReg base; TCGReg index; + TCGAtomAlign aa; } HostAddress; bool tcg_target_has_memory_bswap(MemOp memop) @@ -2034,7 +2035,23 @@ static TCGLabelQemuLdst *prepare_host_addr(TCGContext *s, HostAddress *h, { TCGLabelQemuLdst *ldst = NULL; MemOp opc = get_memop(oi); - unsigned a_bits = get_alignment_bits(opc); + MemOp a_bits; + + /* + * Book II, Section 1.4, Single-Copy Atomicity, specifies: + * + * Before 3.0, "An access that is not atomic is performed as a set of + * smaller disjoint atomic accesses. In general, the number and alignment + * of these accesses are implementation-dependent." Thus MO_ATOM_IFALIGN. + * + * As of 3.0, "the non-atomic access is performed as described in + * the corresponding list", which matches MO_ATOM_SUBALIGN. + */ + h->aa = atom_and_align_for_opc(s, opc, + have_isa_3_00 ? MO_ATOM_SUBALIGN + : MO_ATOM_IFALIGN, + false); + a_bits = h->aa.align; #ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU int mem_index = get_mmuidx(oi);