From: Emil Velikov Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:25:41 +0000 (+0000) Subject: docs: flesh out releasing.html X-Git-Tag: android-x86-6.0-r3~1817 X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2edc29ab1e568ed93b038e049eff95529d17fb53;p=android-x86%2Fexternal-mesa.git docs: flesh out releasing.html Properly document the whole process: - Brief on what, when, where - Picking, testing, branchpoints, pre-release announcement - Releasing, announcement, website and bugzilla updates Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov Reviewed-by: Brian Paul --- diff --git a/docs/devinfo.html b/docs/devinfo.html index f5642bc3bc4..c6e97c68a62 100644 --- a/docs/devinfo.html +++ b/docs/devinfo.html @@ -18,248 +18,9 @@ -

Making a New Mesa Release

- -

-These are the instructions for making a new Mesa release. -

- -

Get latest source files

-

-Use git to get the latest Mesa files from the git repository, from whatever -branch is relevant. This document uses the convention X.Y.Z for the release -being created, which should be created from a branch named X.Y. -

- -

Perform basic testing

-

-The release manager should, at the very least, test the code by compiling it, -installing it, and running the latest piglit to ensure that no piglit tests -have regressed since the previous release. -

- -

-The release manager should do this testing with at least one hardware driver, -(say, whatever is contained in the local development machine), as well as on -both Gallium and non-Gallium software drivers. The software testing can be -performed by running piglit with the following environment-variable set: -

- -
-LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1
-
- -And Gallium vs. non-Gallium software drivers can be obtained by using the -following configure flags on separate builds: - -
---with-dri-drivers=swrast
---with-gallium-drivers=swrast
-
- -

-Note: If both options are given in one build, both swrast_dri.so drivers will -be compiled, but only one will be installed. The following command can be used -to ensure the correct driver is being tested: -

- -
-LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 glxinfo | grep "renderer string"
-
- -If any regressions are found in this testing with piglit, stop here, and do -not perform a release until regressions are fixed. - -

Update version in file VERSION

- -

-Increment the version contained in the file VERSION at Mesa's top-level, then -commit this change. -

- -

Create release notes for the new release

- -

-Create a new file docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html, (follow the style of the previous -release notes). Note that the sha256sums section of the release notes should -be empty at this point. -

- -

-Two scripts are available to help generate portions of the release notes: - -

-	./bin/bugzilla_mesa.sh
-	./bin/shortlog_mesa.sh
-
- -

-The first script identifies commits that reference bugzilla bugs and obtains -the descriptions of those bugs from bugzilla. The second script generates a -log of all commits. In both cases, HTML-formatted lists are printed to stdout -to be included in the release notes. -

- -

-Commit these changes -

- -

Make the release archives, signatures, and the release tag

-

-From inside the Mesa directory: -

-	./autogen.sh
-	make -j1 tarballs
-
- -

-After the tarballs are created, the sha256 checksums for the files will -be computed and printed. These will be used in a step below. -

- -

-It's important at this point to also verify that the constructed tar file -actually builds: -

- -
-	tar xjf MesaLib-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2
-	cd Mesa-X.Y.Z
-	./configure --enable-gallium-llvm
-	make -j6
-	make install
-
- -

-Some touch testing should also be performed at this point, (run glxgears or -more involved OpenGL programs against the installed Mesa). -

- -

-Create detached GPG signatures for each of the archive files created above: -

- -
-	gpg --sign --detach MesaLib-X.Y.Z.tar.gz
-	gpg --sign --detach MesaLib-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2
-	gpg --sign --detach MesaLib-X.Y.Z.zip
-
- -

-Tag the commit used for the build: -

- -
-	git tag -s mesa-X.Y.X -m "Mesa X.Y.Z release"
-
- -

-Note: It would be nice to investigate and fix the issue that causes the -tarballs target to fail with multiple build process, such as with "-j4". It -would also be nice to incorporate all of the above commands into a single -makefile target. And instead of a custom "tarballs" target, we should -incorporate things into the standard "make dist" and "make distcheck" targets. -

- -

Add the sha256sums to the release notes

- -

-Edit docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html to add the sha256sums printed as part of "make -tarballs" in the previous step. Commit this change. -

- -

Push all commits and the tag created above

- -

-This is the first step that cannot easily be undone. The release is going -forward from this point: -

- -
-	git push origin X.Y --tags
-
- -

Install the release files and signatures on the distribution server

- -

-The following commands can be used to copy the release archive files and -signatures to the freedesktop.org server: -

- -
-	scp MesaLib-X.Y.Z* people.freedesktop.org:
-	ssh people.freedesktop.org
-	cd /srv/ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa
-	mkdir X.Y.Z
-	cd X.Y.Z
-	mv ~/MesaLib-X.Y.Z* .
-
- -

Back on mesa master, add the new release notes into the tree

- -

-Something like the following steps will do the trick: -

- -
-	cp docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html /tmp
-        git checkout master
-        cp /tmp/X.Y.Z.html docs/relnotes
-        git add docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html
-
- -

-Also, edit docs/relnotes.html to add a link to the new release notes, and edit -docs/index.html to add a news entry. Then commit and push: -

- -
-	git commit -a -m "docs: Import X.Y.Z release notes, add news item."
-        git push origin
-
- -

Update the mesa3d.org website

- -

-NOTE: The recent release managers have not been performing this step -themselves, but leaving this to Brian Paul, (who has access to the -sourceforge.net hosting for mesa3d.org). Brian is more than willing to grant -the permission necessary to future release managers to do this step on their -own. -

- -

-Update the web site by copying the docs/ directory's files to -/home/users/b/br/brianp/mesa-www/htdocs/ with: -
- -sftp USERNAME,mesa3d@web.sourceforge.net - -

- - -

Announce the release

-

-Make an announcement on the mailing lists: - -mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, -and -mesa-announce@lists.freedesktop.org - -Follow the template of previously-sent release announcements. The following -command can be used to generate the log of changes to be included in the -release announcement: - -

-	git shortlog mesa-X.Y.Z-1..mesa-X.Y.Z
-
-

- -

Adding Extensions

diff --git a/docs/releasing.html b/docs/releasing.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..400cf92121e --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/releasing.html @@ -0,0 +1,499 @@ + + + + + Development Notes + + + + +

+

The Mesa 3D Graphics Library

+
+ + +
+ +

Releasing process

+ + + +

Overview

+ +

+This document uses the convention X.Y.Z for the release number with X.Y being +the stable branch name. +
+Mesa provides feature and bugfix releases. Former use zero as patch version (Z), +while the latter have a non-zero one. +

+ +

+For example: +

+
+	Mesa 10.1.0 - 10.1 branch, feature
+	Mesa 10.1.4 - 10.1 branch, bugfix
+	Mesa 12.0.0 - 12.0 branch, feature
+	Mesa 12.0.2 - 12.0 branch, bugfix
+
+ +

Release schedule

+ +

+Releases should happen on Fridays. Delays can occur although those should be keep +to a minimum. +

+ +

Feature releases

+
    +
  • Available approximatelly every three months. +
  • Initial timeplan available 2-4 weeks before the planned branchpoint (rc1) +on the mesa-announce@ mailing list. +
  • A pre-release announcement should be available +approximatelly 24 hours before the final (non-rc) release. +
+ +

Stable releases

+
    +
  • Normally available once every two weeks. +
  • Only the latest branch has releases. See note below. +
  • A pre-release announcement should be available +approximatelly 48 hours before the actual release. +
+ +

+Note: There is one or two releases overlap when changing branches. For example: +
+The final release from the 12.0 series Mesa 12.0.5 will be out around the same +time (or shortly after) 13.0.1 is out. +

+ +

Cherry-picking and testing

+ +

+Commits nominated for the active branch are picked as based on the +criteria as +described in the same section. + +

+Maintainer is responsible for testing in various possible permutations of +the autoconf and scons build. +

+ +

Cherry-picking and build/check testing

+ +

Done continuously up-to the pre-release announcement.

+ +

+As an exception, patches can be applied up-to the last ~1h before the actual +release. This is made only with explicit permission/request, +and the patch must be very well contained. Thus it cannot +affect more than one driver/subsystem. +

+

+Currently Ilia Mirkin and AMD devs have requested "permanent" exception. +

+ + +
    +
  • make distcheck, scons and scons check must pass +
  • Testing with different version of system components - LLVM and others is also +performed where possible. +
+

+Achieved by combination of local ad-hoc scripts and AppVeyor plus Travis-CI, +the latter as part of their Github integration. +

+ +

Regression/functionality testing

+ +

+Less often (once or twice), shortly before the pre-release announcement. +Ensure that testing is redone if Intel devs have requested an exception, as per above. +

+
    +
  • no regressions should be observed for Piglit/dEQP/CTS/Vulkan on Intel platforms +
  • no regressions should be observed for Piglit using the swrast, softpipe +and llvmpipe drivers +
+

+Currently testing is performed courtesy of the Intel OTC team and their Jenkins CI setup. Check with the Intel team over IRC how to get things setup. +

+ + +

Making a branchpoint

+ +

+A branchpoint is made such that new development can continue in parallel to +stabilisation and bugfixing. +

+ +

+Note: Before doing a branch ensure that basic build and make check +testing is done and there are little to-no issues. +
+Ideally all of those should be tackled already. +

+ +

+Check if the version number is going to remain as, alternatively + git mv docs/relnotes/{current,new}.html as appropriate. +

+ +

+To setup the branchpoint: +

+
+	git checkout master # make sure we're in master first
+	git tag -s X.Y-branchpoint -m "Mesa X.Y branchpoint"
+	git checkout -b X.Y
+	git push origin X.Y-branchpoint X.Y
+
+ +

+Now go to +Bugzilla and add the new Mesa version X.Y. +

+

+Check for rare that there are no distribution breaking changes and revert them +if needed. Extremely rare - we had only one case so far (see +commit 2ced8eb136528914e1bf4e000dea06a9d53c7e04). +

+

+Proceed to release -rc1. +

+ +

Pre-release announcement

+ +

+It comes shortly after outstanding patches in the respective branch are pushed. +Developers can check, in brief, what's the status of their patches. They, +alongside very early testers, are strongly encouraged to test the branch and +report any regressions. +
+It is followed by a brief period (normally 24 or 48 hours) before the actual +release is made. +

+ +

Terminology used

+
  • Nominated
+

+Patch that is nominated but yet to to merged in the patch queue/branch. +

+ +
  • Queued
+

+Patch is in the queue/branch and will feature in the next release. +Barring reported regressions or objections from developers. +

+ +
  • Rejected
+

+Patch does not fit the +criteria and +is followed by a brief information. +
+The release maintainer is human so if you believe you've spotted a mistake do +let them know. +

+ +

Format/template

+
+Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Mesa X.Y.Z release candidate
+To: mesa-announce@...
+Cc: mesa-dev@...
+
+Hello list,
+
+The candidate for the Mesa X.Y.Z is now available. Currently we have:
+ - NUMBER queued
+ - NUMBER nominated (outstanding)
+ - and NUMBER rejected patches
+
+BRIEF SUMMARY OF CHANGES
+
+Take a look at section "Mesa stable queue" for more information.
+
+
+Testing reports/general approval
+--------------------------------
+Any testing reports (or general approval of the state of the branch) will be
+greatly appreciated.
+
+The plan is to have X.Y.Z this DAY (DATE), around or shortly after TIME.
+
+If you have any questions or suggestions - be that about the current patch
+queue or otherwise, please go ahead.
+
+
+Trivial merge conflicts
+-----------------------
+List of commits where manual intervention was required.
+Keep the authors in the CC list.
+
+commit SHA
+Author: AUTHOR
+
+    COMMIT SUMMARY
+
+    CHERRY PICKED FROM
+
+
+For example:
+
+commit 990f395e007c3204639daa34efc3049f350ee819
+Author: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
+
+    anv: automake: cleanup the generated json file during make clean
+
+    (cherry picked from commit 8df581520a823564be0ab5af7dbb7d501b1c9670)
+
+
+Cheers,
+Emil
+
+
+Mesa stable queue
+-----------------
+
+Nominated (NUMBER)
+==================
+
+AUTHOR (NUMBER):
+      SHA     COMMIT SUMMARY
+
+For example:
+
+Dave Airlie (1):
+      2de85eb radv: fix texturesamples to handle single sample case
+
+
+Queued (NUMBER)
+===============
+
+AUTHOR (NUMBER):
+      COMMIT SUMMARY
+
+
+Rejected (NUMBER)
+=================
+
+Rejected (11)
+=============
+
+AUTHOR (NUMBER):
+      SHA     COMMIT SUMMARY
+
+Reason: ...
+
+ +

Making a new release

+ +* process - manual + xorg tool ++ ^^ verify ++ touch test -> glxgears/info dota2vk + + +

+These are the instructions for making a new Mesa release. +

+ +

Get latest source files

+

+Ensure the latest code is available - both in your local master and the +relevant branch. +

+ +

Perform basic testing

+

+Most of the testing should already be done during the +cherry-pick and +pre-announce stages. + +So we do a quick 'touch test' +

    +
  • make distcheck (you can omit this if you're not using --dist below) +
  • scons (from release tarball) +
  • the produced binaries work +
+ +

+Here is one solution that I've been using. +

+ +
+	git clean -fXd; git clean -nxd
+	read # quick cross check any outstanding files
+	export __mesa_root=../
+	export __build_root=./foo
+	chmod 755 -fR $__build_root; rm -rf $__build_root
+	mkdir -p $__build_root && cd $__build_root
+
+	 $__mesa_root/autogen.sh --enable-llvm-shared-libs && make -j2 distcheck
+
+	# Build check the tarballs (scons)
+	tar -xaf mesa-*.tar.xz && cd mesa-* && scons && cd ..
+
+	# Test the automake binaries
+	tar -xaf mesa-*.tar.xz && cd mesa-*
+	./configure \
+		--with-dri-drivers=i965,swrast \
+		--with-gallium-drivers=swrast \
+		--enable-llvm-shared-libs \
+		--enable-gallium-llvm
+	make -j2 && DESTDIR=`pwd`/test make -j6 install
+	export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/test/usr/local/lib/
+	export LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=`pwd`/test/usr/local/lib/dri/
+	xport LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose
+	glxinfo | egrep -o "Mesa.*"
+	glxgears
+	export LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1
+	glxinfo | egrep -o "Mesa.*|Gallium.*"
+	glxgears
+	export LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1
+	export GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe
+	glxinfo | egrep -o "Mesa.*|Gallium.*"
+	glxgears
+
+ +

Update version in file VERSION

+ +

+Increment the version contained in the file VERSION at Mesa's top-level, then +commit this change. +

+ +

Create release notes for the new release

+ +

+Create a new file docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html, (follow the style of the previous +release notes). Note that the sha256sums section of the release notes should +be empty (TBD) at this point. +

+ +

+Two scripts are available to help generate portions of the release notes: + +

+	./bin/bugzilla_mesa.sh
+	./bin/shortlog_mesa.sh
+
+ +

+The first script identifies commits that reference bugzilla bugs and obtains +the descriptions of those bugs from bugzilla. The second script generates a +log of all commits. In both cases, HTML-formatted lists are printed to stdout +to be included in the release notes. +

+ +

+Commit these changes and push the branch. +

+
+	git push origin HEAD
+
+ + +

Use the release.sh script from xorg util-macros

+ +

+If latest checkout [still] does not the mesa integration, fetch the patches +from Patchwork. +

+ +

+Ensure that the mesa git tree is clean via git clean -fXd and +start the release process. +

+
+	../relative/path/to/release.sh . # append --dist if you've already done distcheck above
+
+ +

+Pay close attention to the prompts as you might be required to enter your GPG +and SSH passphrase(s) to sign and upload the files, respectively. +

+ +

Add the sha256sums to the release notes

+ +

+Edit docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html to add the sha256sums as availabe in the mesa-X.Y.Z.announce template. Commit this change. +

+ +

Back on mesa master, add the new release notes into the tree

+ +

+Something like the following steps will do the trick: +

+ +
+	git cherry-pick -x X.Y~1
+	git cherry-pick -x X.Y
+
+ +

+Also, edit docs/relnotes.html to add a link to the new release notes, and edit +docs/index.html to add a news entry. Then commit and push: +

+ +
+	git commit -as -m "docs: add news item and link release notes for X.Y.Z"
+	git push origin master X.Y
+
+ + +

Announce the release

+

+Use the generated template during the releasing process. +

+ + +

Update the mesa3d.org website

+ +

+NOTE: The recent release managers have not been performing this step +themselves, but leaving this to Brian Paul, (who has access to the +sourceforge.net hosting for mesa3d.org). Brian is more than willing to grant +the permission necessary to future release managers to do this step on their +own. +

+ +

+Update the web site by copying the docs/ directory's files to +/home/users/b/br/brianp/mesa-www/htdocs/ with: +
+ +sftp USERNAME,mesa3d@web.sourceforge.net + +

+ + +

Update Bugzilla

+ +

+Parse through the bugreports as listed in the docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html +document. +
+If there's outstanding action, close the bug referencing the commit ID which +addresses the bug and mention the Mesa version that has the fix. +

+ +

+Note: the above is not applicable to all the reports, so use common sense. +

+ + +
+ +