From: David Sterba Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:56:28 +0000 (+0200) Subject: btrfs: use assertion helpers for spinning writers X-Git-Tag: v5.2-rc1~163^2~206 X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=843ccf9f46baff289946e897b11fd813de62d06f;p=uclinux-h8%2Flinux.git btrfs: use assertion helpers for spinning writers Use the helpers where open coded. On non-debug builds, the warnings will not trigger and extent_buffer::spining_writers become unused and can be moved to the appropriate section, saving a few bytes. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index cc3941ae1ff6..fc0451c3e24e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4682,7 +4682,6 @@ __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start, atomic_set(&eb->blocking_readers, 0); atomic_set(&eb->blocking_writers, 0); atomic_set(&eb->spinning_readers, 0); - atomic_set(&eb->spinning_writers, 0); eb->lock_nested = 0; init_waitqueue_head(&eb->write_lock_wq); init_waitqueue_head(&eb->read_lock_wq); @@ -4700,6 +4699,10 @@ __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start, > MAX_INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_SIZE); BUG_ON(len > MAX_INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_SIZE); +#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG + atomic_set(&eb->spinning_writers, 0); +#endif + return eb; } diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h index 1e5be66c7e0b..3577ef33bc36 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h @@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ struct extent_buffer { atomic_t blocking_writers; atomic_t blocking_readers; atomic_t spinning_readers; - atomic_t spinning_writers; short lock_nested; /* >= 0 if eb belongs to a log tree, -1 otherwise */ short log_index; @@ -185,6 +184,7 @@ struct extent_buffer { wait_queue_head_t read_lock_wq; struct page *pages[INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_PAGES]; #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG + atomic_t spinning_writers; struct list_head leak_list; #endif }; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c index 13ef1decdea6..a5a3c5118f61 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c @@ -64,8 +64,7 @@ void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(struct extent_buffer *eb) if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) return; if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0) { - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1); - atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers); + btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(eb); btrfs_assert_tree_locked(eb); atomic_inc(&eb->blocking_writers); write_unlock(&eb->lock); @@ -101,8 +100,7 @@ void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_write(struct extent_buffer *eb) return; BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) != 1); write_lock(&eb->lock); - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); - atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(eb); /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers)) cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq); @@ -200,7 +198,7 @@ int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) return 0; } atomic_inc(&eb->write_locks); - atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(eb); eb->lock_owner = current->pid; return 1; } @@ -266,8 +264,7 @@ again: write_unlock(&eb->lock); goto again; } - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); - atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(eb); atomic_inc(&eb->write_locks); eb->lock_owner = current->pid; } @@ -286,14 +283,13 @@ void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb) atomic_dec(&eb->write_locks); if (blockers) { - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); + btrfs_assert_no_spinning_writers(eb); atomic_dec(&eb->blocking_writers); /* Use the lighter barrier after atomic */ smp_mb__after_atomic(); cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq); } else { - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1); - atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers); + btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(eb); write_unlock(&eb->lock); } }