From: Kevin Buettner Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 19:27:15 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Protoization. X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=91d19d3111cbb49f27f7f899f4560b629c356f74;p=pf3gnuchains%2Fpf3gnuchains3x.git Protoization. --- diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 2017a23e34..1119260718 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2000-09-07 Kevin Buettner + + * i386mach-nat.c (fetch_inferior_registers, fetch_core_registers): + Protoize. + * i960-tdep.c (i960_skip_prologue, leafproc_return, mem): Protoize. + Thu Sep 7 21:59:23 2000 Andrew Cagney * aclocal.m4: Regenerate. diff --git a/gdb/i386mach-nat.c b/gdb/i386mach-nat.c index 966acb898b..1759b0fb21 100644 --- a/gdb/i386mach-nat.c +++ b/gdb/i386mach-nat.c @@ -40,8 +40,7 @@ static void fetch_core_registers (char *, unsigned, int, CORE_ADDR); void -fetch_inferior_registers (regno) - int regno; /* Original value discarded */ +fetch_inferior_registers (int regno) { struct regs inferior_registers; struct fp_state inferior_fp_registers; @@ -109,14 +108,21 @@ store_inferior_registers (int regno) -/* Work with core files, for GDB. */ +/* Provide registers to GDB from a core file. + + CORE_REG_SECT points to an array of bytes, which were obtained from + a core file which BFD thinks might contain register contents. + CORE_REG_SIZE is its size. + + WHICH says which register set corelow suspects this is: + 0 --- the general-purpose register set + 2 --- the floating-point register set + + REG_ADDR isn't used. */ static void -fetch_core_registers (core_reg_sect, core_reg_size, which, reg_addr) - char *core_reg_sect; - unsigned core_reg_size; - int which; - CORE_ADDR reg_addr; /* Unused in this version */ +fetch_core_registers (char *core_reg_sect, unsigned core_reg_size, + int which, CORE_ADDR reg_addr) { int val; diff --git a/gdb/i960-tdep.c b/gdb/i960-tdep.c index 7bc0e882eb..21eb754f17 100644 --- a/gdb/i960-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/i960-tdep.c @@ -331,8 +331,7 @@ examine_prologue (register CORE_ADDR ip, register CORE_ADDR limit, prologue. */ CORE_ADDR -i960_skip_prologue (ip) -CORE_ADDR (ip); +i960_skip_prologue (CORE_ADDR ip) { struct frame_saved_regs saved_regs_dummy; struct symtab_and_line sal; @@ -479,9 +478,11 @@ frame_struct_result_address (struct frame_info *fi) } /* Return address to which the currently executing leafproc will return, - or 0 if ip is not in a leafproc (or if we can't tell if it is). + or 0 if IP, the value of the instruction pointer from the currently + executing function, is not in a leafproc (or if we can't tell if it + is). - Do this by finding the starting address of the routine in which ip lies. + Do this by finding the starting address of the routine in which IP lies. If the instruction there is "mov g14, gx" (where x is in [0,7]), this is a leafproc and the return address is in register gx. Well, this is true unless the return address points at a RET instruction in the current @@ -489,8 +490,7 @@ frame_struct_result_address (struct frame_info *fi) has been entered through the CALL entry point. */ CORE_ADDR -leafproc_return (ip) - CORE_ADDR ip; /* ip from currently executing function */ +leafproc_return (CORE_ADDR ip) { register struct minimal_symbol *msymbol; char *p; @@ -684,12 +684,13 @@ struct tabent char numops; }; -static int /* returns instruction length: 4 or 8 */ -mem (memaddr, word1, word2, noprint) - unsigned long memaddr; - unsigned long word1, word2; - int noprint; /* If TRUE, return instruction length, but - don't output any text. */ +/* Return instruction length, either 4 or 8. When NOPRINT is non-zero + (TRUE), don't output any text. (Actually, as implemented, if NOPRINT + is 0, abort() is called.) */ + +static int +mem (unsigned long memaddr, unsigned long word1, unsigned long word2, + int noprint) { int i, j; int len;