From: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 07:08:37 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: intel: Remove check for kernel 2.6.29.
X-Git-Tag: android-x86-4.4-r1~508
X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=97e40a524ebee72dc06208f2c730c25c962dea2a;p=android-x86%2Fexternal-mesa.git

intel: Remove check for kernel 2.6.29.

Now that we require 2.6.39, there's no need to also check for 2.6.29.
Calling drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs() without checking
should be safe, as it simply sets a flag.

This does remove the check for zero fences available, but that doesn't
seem worth checking.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
---

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c
index eb451ba546b..58496e232c9 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c
@@ -989,7 +989,6 @@ static bool
 intel_init_bufmgr(struct intel_screen *intelScreen)
 {
    __DRIscreen *spriv = intelScreen->driScrnPriv;
-   int num_fences = 0;
 
    intelScreen->no_hw = getenv("INTEL_NO_HW") != NULL;
 
@@ -1000,12 +999,6 @@ intel_init_bufmgr(struct intel_screen *intelScreen)
       return false;
    }
 
-   if (!intel_get_param(spriv, I915_PARAM_NUM_FENCES_AVAIL, &num_fences) ||
-       num_fences == 0) {
-      fprintf(stderr, "[%s: %u] Kernel 2.6.29 required.\n", __func__, __LINE__);
-      return false;
-   }
-
    drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs(intelScreen->bufmgr);
 
    if (!intel_get_boolean(spriv, I915_PARAM_HAS_RELAXED_DELTA)) {