From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:29:30 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: selftests/bpf: fix compiling loop{1, 2, 3}.c on s390
X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=af3c24e0e2ed25177b03b60ada9117bb596e8d95;p=android-x86%2Fkernel.git

selftests/bpf: fix compiling loop{1, 2, 3}.c on s390

Use PT_REGS_RC(ctx) instead of ctx->rax, which is not present on s390.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Tested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop1.c
index dea395af9ea9..7cdb7f878310 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop1.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop1.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int nested_loops(volatile struct pt_regs* ctx)
 	for (j = 0; j < 300; j++)
 		for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
 			if (j & 1)
-				m = ctx->rax;
+				m = PT_REGS_RC(ctx);
 			else
 				m = j;
 			sum += i * m;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop2.c
index 0637bd8e8bcf..9b2f808a2863 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop2.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop2.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ int while_true(volatile struct pt_regs* ctx)
 	int i = 0;
 
 	while (true) {
-		if (ctx->rax & 1)
+		if (PT_REGS_RC(ctx) & 1)
 			i += 3;
 		else
 			i += 7;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop3.c
index 30a0f6cba080..d727657d51e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/loop3.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ int while_true(volatile struct pt_regs* ctx)
 	__u64 i = 0, sum = 0;
 	do {
 		i++;
-		sum += ctx->rax;
+		sum += PT_REGS_RC(ctx);
 	} while (i < 0x100000000ULL);
 	return sum;
 }