From: Andrew Cagney Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 03:17:57 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Multi-arch EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED (nee NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED). X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b92948b3fa3c785f8f058f19d91508551647f9c2;p=pf3gnuchains%2Fpf3gnuchains3x.git Multi-arch EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED (nee NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED). --- diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 866bc29546..1629218842 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +Wed Aug 2 21:15:26 2000 Andrew Cagney + + * gdbarch.sh (EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED): Add. + * gdbarch.h, gdbarch.c: Regenerate. + * valops.c (hand_function_call): Replace #ifndef + NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED with if EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED. + + * d10v-tdep.c (d10v_gdbarch_init): Set + extra_stack_alignment_needed to 0. + * config/d10v/tm-d10v.h (NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED): Delete. + * config/pa/tm-hppa.h (EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED): Replace + NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED. + 2000-08-03 Stephane Carrez * MAINTAINERS (m68hc11): Stephane Carrez is maintainer. diff --git a/gdb/config/pa/tm-hppa.h b/gdb/config/pa/tm-hppa.h index 2dbb74bee3..269e30f204 100644 --- a/gdb/config/pa/tm-hppa.h +++ b/gdb/config/pa/tm-hppa.h @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ extern CORE_ADDR saved_pc_after_call (struct frame_info *); On hppa the sp must always be kept 64-bit aligned */ #define STACK_ALIGN(arg) ( ((arg)%8) ? (((arg)+7)&-8) : (arg)) -#define NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED 1 +#define EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED 0 /* Sequence of bytes for breakpoint instruction. */ diff --git a/gdb/d10v-tdep.c b/gdb/d10v-tdep.c index c5b7b5a6c3..ed71bfc658 100644 --- a/gdb/d10v-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/d10v-tdep.c @@ -1603,6 +1603,7 @@ d10v_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches) set_gdbarch_stack_align (gdbarch, d10v_stack_align); set_gdbarch_register_sim_regno (gdbarch, d10v_register_sim_regno); + set_gdbarch_extra_stack_alignment_needed (gdbarch, 0); return gdbarch; } diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h index 64b0368830..7f713c795a 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbarch.h +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h @@ -1114,6 +1114,19 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_stack_align (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_stack_alig #endif #endif +/* Default (value) for non- multi-arch platforms. */ +#if (!GDB_MULTI_ARCH) && !defined (EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED) +#define EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED (1) +#endif + +extern int gdbarch_extra_stack_alignment_needed (struct gdbarch *gdbarch); +extern void set_gdbarch_extra_stack_alignment_needed (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int extra_stack_alignment_needed); +#if GDB_MULTI_ARCH +#if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL) || !defined (EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED) +#define EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED (gdbarch_extra_stack_alignment_needed (current_gdbarch)) +#endif +#endif + #if defined (REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR) /* Legacy for systems yet to multi-arch REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR */ #define REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR_P() (1) diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.sh b/gdb/gdbarch.sh index a64d340c30..0c9bdfb027 100755 --- a/gdb/gdbarch.sh +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.sh @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ f:2:SAVED_PC_AFTER_CALL:CORE_ADDR:saved_pc_after_call:struct frame_info *frame:f f:2:FRAME_NUM_ARGS:int:frame_num_args:struct frame_info *frame:frame::0:0 # F:2:STACK_ALIGN:CORE_ADDR:stack_align:CORE_ADDR sp:sp::0:0 +v:1:EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED:int:extra_stack_alignment_needed::::0:1::0::: F:2:REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR:int:reg_struct_has_addr:int gcc_p, struct type *type:gcc_p, type::0:0 F:2:SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS:void:save_dummy_frame_tos:CORE_ADDR sp:sp::0:0 # diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c index df1e9ee2bc..19482f1bff 100644 --- a/gdb/valops.c +++ b/gdb/valops.c @@ -1581,27 +1581,27 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name); } } -/* elz: on HPPA no need for this extra alignment, maybe it is needed - on other architectures. This is because all the alignment is taken care - of in the above code (ifdef REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR) and in - hppa_push_arguments */ -#ifndef NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED - - /* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code is - really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in - a target-defined manner. */ - if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2)) - { - /* If stack grows down, we must leave a hole at the top. */ - int len = 0; - - for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--) - len += TYPE_LENGTH (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i])); - if (CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST_P) - len += CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST; - sp -= STACK_ALIGN (len) - len; + /* elz: on HPPA no need for this extra alignment, maybe it is needed + on other architectures. This is because all the alignment is + taken care of in the above code (ifdef REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR) and + in hppa_push_arguments */ + if (EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED) + { + /* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code + is really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the + stack in a target-defined manner. */ + if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2)) + { + /* If stack grows down, we must leave a hole at the top. */ + int len = 0; + + for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--) + len += TYPE_LENGTH (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i])); + if (CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST_P) + len += CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST; + sp -= STACK_ALIGN (len) - len; + } } -#endif /* NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED */ sp = PUSH_ARGUMENTS (nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr);