From: Richard Henderson Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:58:31 +0000 (-1000) Subject: target/arm: Diagnose incorrect usage of arm_is_secure subroutines X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fcc7404eff24b4c;p=qmiga%2Fqemu.git target/arm: Diagnose incorrect usage of arm_is_secure subroutines In several places we use arm_is_secure_below_el3 and arm_is_el3_or_mon separately from arm_is_secure. These functions make no sense for m-profile, and would indicate prior incorrect feature testing. Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson Message-id: 20230227225832.816605-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index ab18701277..c097cae988 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -2384,7 +2384,8 @@ static inline int arm_feature(CPUARMState *env, int feature) void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp); #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) -/* Return true if exception levels below EL3 are in secure state, +/* + * Return true if exception levels below EL3 are in secure state, * or would be following an exception return to that level. * Unlike arm_is_secure() (which is always a question about the * _current_ state of the CPU) this doesn't care about the current @@ -2392,6 +2393,7 @@ void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp); */ static inline bool arm_is_secure_below_el3(CPUARMState *env) { + assert(!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)); if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) { return !(env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_NS); } else { @@ -2405,6 +2407,7 @@ static inline bool arm_is_secure_below_el3(CPUARMState *env) /* Return true if the CPU is AArch64 EL3 or AArch32 Mon */ static inline bool arm_is_el3_or_mon(CPUARMState *env) { + assert(!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)); if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) { if (is_a64(env) && extract32(env->pstate, 2, 2) == 3) { /* CPU currently in AArch64 state and EL3 */