From: Nick Lewycky Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 03:51:46 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Move optimization of some cases of (A & C1)|(B & C2) from instcombine to instsimplify... X-Git-Tag: android-x86-7.1-r4~60565 X-Git-Url: http://git.osdn.net/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fe3a219355b58428b93461c6c0517a9b90ebe962;p=android-x86%2Fexternal-llvm.git Move optimization of some cases of (A & C1)|(B & C2) from instcombine to instsimplify. Patch by Rahul Jain, plus some last minute changes by me -- you can blame me for any bugs. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp b/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp index b06d9948ac1..8aa6e5a190b 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp @@ -1625,6 +1625,38 @@ static Value *SimplifyOrInst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const Query &Q, MaxRecurse)) return V; + // (A & C)|(B & D) + Value *C = nullptr, *D = nullptr; + if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(C))) && + match(Op1, m_And(m_Value(B), m_Value(D)))) { + ConstantInt *C1 = dyn_cast(C); + ConstantInt *C2 = dyn_cast(D); + if (C1 && C2 && (C1->getValue() == ~C2->getValue())) { + // (A & C1)|(B & C2) + // If we have: ((V + N) & C1) | (V & C2) + // .. and C2 = ~C1 and C2 is 0+1+ and (N & C2) == 0 + // replace with V+N. + Value *V1, *V2; + if ((C2->getValue() & (C2->getValue() + 1)) == 0 && // C2 == 0+1+ + match(A, m_Add(m_Value(V1), m_Value(V2)))) { + // Add commutes, try both ways. + if (V1 == B && MaskedValueIsZero(V2, C2->getValue())) + return A; + if (V2 == B && MaskedValueIsZero(V1, C2->getValue())) + return A; + } + // Or commutes, try both ways. + if ((C1->getValue() & (C1->getValue() + 1)) == 0 && + match(B, m_Add(m_Value(V1), m_Value(V2)))) { + // Add commutes, try both ways. + if (V1 == A && MaskedValueIsZero(V2, C1->getValue())) + return B; + if (V2 == A && MaskedValueIsZero(V1, C1->getValue())) + return B; + } + } + } + // If the operation is with the result of a phi instruction, check whether // operating on all incoming values of the phi always yields the same value. if (isa(Op0) || isa(Op1)) diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp index 4f5d65ab785..b23a606e088 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp @@ -1996,29 +1996,6 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitOr(BinaryOperator &I) { C1 = dyn_cast(C); C2 = dyn_cast(D); if (C1 && C2) { // (A & C1)|(B & C2) - // If we have: ((V + N) & C1) | (V & C2) - // .. and C2 = ~C1 and C2 is 0+1+ and (N & C2) == 0 - // replace with V+N. - if (C1->getValue() == ~C2->getValue()) { - if ((C2->getValue() & (C2->getValue()+1)) == 0 && // C2 == 0+1+ - match(A, m_Add(m_Value(V1), m_Value(V2)))) { - // Add commutes, try both ways. - if (V1 == B && MaskedValueIsZero(V2, C2->getValue())) - return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, A); - if (V2 == B && MaskedValueIsZero(V1, C2->getValue())) - return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, A); - } - // Or commutes, try both ways. - if ((C1->getValue() & (C1->getValue()+1)) == 0 && - match(B, m_Add(m_Value(V1), m_Value(V2)))) { - // Add commutes, try both ways. - if (V1 == A && MaskedValueIsZero(V2, C1->getValue())) - return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, B); - if (V2 == A && MaskedValueIsZero(V1, C1->getValue())) - return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, B); - } - } - if ((C1->getValue() & C2->getValue()) == 0) { // ((V | N) & C1) | (V & C2) --> (V|N) & (C1|C2) // iff (C1&C2) == 0 and (N&~C1) == 0 diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/apint-or.ll b/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/apint-or.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d314db7133 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/apint-or.ll @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -instsimplify -S | not grep or + +; Test the case where integer BitWidth <= 64 && BitWidth % 2 != 0. +define i39 @test1(i39 %V, i39 %M) { + ;; If we have: ((V + N) & C1) | (V & C2) + ;; .. and C2 = ~C1 and C2 is 0+1+ and (N & C2) == 0 + ;; replace with V+N. + %C1 = xor i39 274877906943, -1 ;; C2 = 274877906943 + %N = and i39 %M, 274877906944 + %A = add i39 %V, %N + %B = and i39 %A, %C1 + %D = and i39 %V, 274877906943 + %R = or i39 %B, %D + ret i39 %R +; CHECK-LABEL @test1 +; CHECK-NEXT: and {{.*}}, -274877906944 +; CHECK-NEXT: add +; CHECK-NEXT: ret +} + +; Test the case where Integer BitWidth > 64 && BitWidth <= 1024. +define i399 @test2(i399 %V, i399 %M) { + ;; If we have: ((V + N) & C1) | (V & C2) + ;; .. and C2 = ~C1 and C2 is 0+1+ and (N & C2) == 0 + ;; replace with V+N. + %C1 = xor i399 274877906943, -1 ;; C2 = 274877906943 + %N = and i399 %M, 18446742974197923840 + %A = add i399 %V, %N + %B = and i399 %A, %C1 + %D = and i399 %V, 274877906943 + %R = or i399 %B, %D + ret i399 %R +; CHECK-LABEL @test2 +; CHECK-NEXT: and {{.*}}, 18446742974197923840 +; CHECK-NEXT: add +; CHECK-NEXT: ret +}