workingset: fix confusion around eviction vs refault container

workingset: fix confusion around eviction vs refault container

Refault decisions are made based on the lruvec where the page was evicted,
as that determined its LRU order while it was alive.  Stats and workingset
aging must then occur on the lruvec of the new page, as that's the node
and cgroup that experience the refault and that's the lruvec whose
nonresident info ages out by a new resident page.  Those lruvecs could be
different when a page is shared between cgroups, or the refaulting page is
allocated on a different node.

There are currently two mix-ups:

1. When swap is available, the resident anon set must be considered
   when comparing the refault distance. The comparison is made against
   the right anon set, but the check for swap is not. When pages get
   evicted from a cgroup with swap, and refault in one without, this
   can incorrectly consider a hot refault as cold - and vice
   versa. Fix that by using the eviction cgroup for the swap check.

2. The stats and workingset age are updated against the wrong lruvec
   altogether: the right cgroup but the wrong NUMA node. When a page
   refaults on a different NUMA node, this will have confusing stats
   and distort the workingset age on a different lruvec - again
   possibly resulting in hot/cold misclassifications down the line.

Fix the swap check and the refault pgdat to address both concerns.

This was found during code review.  It hasn't caused notable issues in
production, suggesting that those refault-migrations are relatively rare
in practice.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230104222944.2380117-1-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Co-developed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>