From 00b58595e96b4a6eeae0f41289026e6cf04ea54e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 06:54:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Tweak wording in comment in last change --- ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em | 19 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em b/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em index 44223a89bb..2bb650c2e1 100644 --- a/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em +++ b/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em @@ -62,15 +62,16 @@ mmix_after_allocation () bfd_signed_vma regvma; /* If there's no register section, we don't need to do anything. On the - other hand, if a non-standard linker-script without a mapping from - MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME is present, as in the ld - test "NOCROSSREFS 2", that section (1) will be orphaned; not inserted - in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we will not do the - necessary preparations for those relocations that caused it to be - created. We'll SEGV from the latter error. The former error in - separation will result in a non-working binary, but that's expected - when you play tricks with linker scripts. The "NOCROSSREFS 2" test - does not run the output so it does not matter there. */ + other hand, if there's a non-standard linker-script without a mapping + from MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME when that section is + present (as in the ld test "NOCROSSREFS 2"), that section (1) will be + orphaned; not inserted in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we + will not do the necessary preparations for those relocations that + caused it to be created. We'll SEGV from the latter error. The + former error in separation will result in a non-working binary, but + that's expected when you play tricks with linker scripts. The + "NOCROSSREFS 2" test does not run the output so it does not matter + there. */ if (sec == NULL) sec = bfd_get_section_by_name (output_bfd, -- 2.11.0