From 1d9a6159bd04b676cb7d9b13245888fa450cec10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kefeng Wang Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:47:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com To: joe@perches.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Acked-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek --- kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index bc88fd939f4e..cfc923558e04 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq) for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) { - pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n", - __func__, wq->name); + pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n", + __func__, wq->name); show_pwq(pwq); spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); -- 2.11.0