From 3901bbc170b73b13aa5092f5709a495a1847198f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastien Hertz <shertz@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:37:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix DDM reply buffer deallocation

Reply buffer is an uint8_t* allocated with new uint8_t[...] so it
must be deallocated with delete[], not free.

Change-Id: Ib5d6387aa63f1e0393113f82602f661bbada4aa2
---
 runtime/jdwp/jdwp_handler.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/runtime/jdwp/jdwp_handler.cc b/runtime/jdwp/jdwp_handler.cc
index f449406d1..7776f8fad 100644
--- a/runtime/jdwp/jdwp_handler.cc
+++ b/runtime/jdwp/jdwp_handler.cc
@@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ static JdwpError DDM_Chunk(JdwpState* state, Request* request, ExpandBuf* pReply
     // heap requirements is probably more valuable than the efficiency.
     CHECK_GT(replyLen, 0);
     memcpy(expandBufAddSpace(pReply, replyLen), replyBuf, replyLen);
-    free(replyBuf);
+    delete[] replyBuf;
   }
   return ERR_NONE;
 }
-- 
2.11.0