From 3ef13f3c22aaea28aff383cb0883481d24885456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Grover Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:37:17 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] RDS: cleanup/fix rds_rdma_unuse First, it looks to me like the atomic_inc is wrong. We should be decrementing refcount only once here, no? It's already being done by the mr_put() at the end. Second, simplify the logic a bit by bailing early (with a warning) if !mr. Signed-off-by: Andy Grover --- net/rds/rdma.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rds/rdma.c b/net/rds/rdma.c index 24274bb9e329..5011efa62a92 100644 --- a/net/rds/rdma.c +++ b/net/rds/rdma.c @@ -414,27 +414,30 @@ void rds_rdma_unuse(struct rds_sock *rs, u32 r_key, int force) spin_lock_irqsave(&rs->rs_rdma_lock, flags); mr = rds_mr_tree_walk(&rs->rs_rdma_keys, r_key, NULL); - if (mr && (mr->r_use_once || force)) { + if (!mr) { + printk(KERN_ERR "rds: trying to unuse MR with unknown r_key %u!\n", r_key); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rs->rs_rdma_lock, flags); + return; + } + + if (mr->r_use_once || force) { rb_erase(&mr->r_rb_node, &rs->rs_rdma_keys); RB_CLEAR_NODE(&mr->r_rb_node); zot_me = 1; - } else if (mr) - atomic_inc(&mr->r_refcount); + } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rs->rs_rdma_lock, flags); /* May have to issue a dma_sync on this memory region. * Note we could avoid this if the operation was a RDMA READ, * but at this point we can't tell. */ - if (mr) { - if (mr->r_trans->sync_mr) - mr->r_trans->sync_mr(mr->r_trans_private, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + if (mr->r_trans->sync_mr) + mr->r_trans->sync_mr(mr->r_trans_private, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); - /* If the MR was marked as invalidate, this will - * trigger an async flush. */ - if (zot_me) - rds_destroy_mr(mr); - rds_mr_put(mr); - } + /* If the MR was marked as invalidate, this will + * trigger an async flush. */ + if (zot_me) + rds_destroy_mr(mr); + rds_mr_put(mr); } void rds_rdma_free_op(struct rds_rdma_op *ro) -- 2.11.0