From 405ba88ac6325f52013151cc026a2177dbc15a30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hansong Zhang <hsz@google.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:29:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Introduce BTM_SetRfcommSecurity

Store RFCOMM security requirements in a separate map

Bug: 159815595
Tag: #refactor
Test: compile & verify basic functions working
Change-Id: I6e1737e54506e8744f350c6ba6f75b47c77ea885
---
 stack/btm/btm_sec.cc | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc b/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
index 329af1190..526c98a91 100644
--- a/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
+++ b/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
@@ -506,6 +506,20 @@ bool BTM_SetSecurityLevel(bool is_originator, const char* p_name,
   return (record_allocated);
 }
 
+struct RfcommSecurityRecord {
+  uint32_t scn;
+  bool need_mitm;
+  bool need_16_digit_pin;
+};
+static std::unordered_map<uint32_t, RfcommSecurityRecord>
+    legacy_stack_rfcomm_security_records;
+
+void BTM_SetRfcommSecurity(uint32_t scn, bool need_mitm,
+                           bool need_16_digit_pin) {
+  legacy_stack_rfcomm_security_records[scn] = {scn, need_mitm,
+                                               need_16_digit_pin};
+}
+
 /*******************************************************************************
  *
  * Function         BTM_SecClrService
-- 
2.11.0