From 453c2a8967e582212eaf68c80fa8256d41b94fc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heinz Mauelshagen Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:46:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dm raid: correct error messages on old metadata validation When target 1.9.1 gets takeover/reshape requests on devices with old superblock format not supporting such conversions and rejects them in super_init_validation(), it logs bogus error message (e.g. Reshape when a takeover is requested). Whilst on it, add messages for disk adding/removing and stripe sectors reshape requests, use the newer rs_{takeover,reshape}_requested() API, address a raid10 false positive in checking array positions and remove rs_set_new() because device members are already set proper. Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer --- drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c index 6d53810963f7..698b03e9d955 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c @@ -2050,16 +2050,17 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct raid_set *rs, struct md_rdev *rdev) mddev->reshape_position = MaxSector; + mddev->raid_disks = le32_to_cpu(sb->num_devices); + mddev->level = le32_to_cpu(sb->level); + mddev->layout = le32_to_cpu(sb->layout); + mddev->chunk_sectors = le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors); + /* * Reshaping is supported, e.g. reshape_position is valid * in superblock and superblock content is authoritative. */ if (le32_to_cpu(sb->compat_features) & FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190) { /* Superblock is authoritative wrt given raid set layout! */ - mddev->raid_disks = le32_to_cpu(sb->num_devices); - mddev->level = le32_to_cpu(sb->level); - mddev->layout = le32_to_cpu(sb->layout); - mddev->chunk_sectors = le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors); mddev->new_level = le32_to_cpu(sb->new_level); mddev->new_layout = le32_to_cpu(sb->new_layout); mddev->new_chunk_sectors = le32_to_cpu(sb->new_stripe_sectors); @@ -2087,38 +2088,44 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct raid_set *rs, struct md_rdev *rdev) /* * No takeover/reshaping, because we don't have the extended v1.9.0 metadata */ - if (le32_to_cpu(sb->level) != mddev->new_level) { - DMERR("Reshaping/takeover raid sets not yet supported. (raid level/stripes/size change)"); - return -EINVAL; - } - if (le32_to_cpu(sb->layout) != mddev->new_layout) { - DMERR("Reshaping raid sets not yet supported. (raid layout change)"); - DMERR(" 0x%X vs 0x%X", le32_to_cpu(sb->layout), mddev->layout); - DMERR(" Old layout: %s w/ %d copies", - raid10_md_layout_to_format(le32_to_cpu(sb->layout)), - raid10_md_layout_to_copies(le32_to_cpu(sb->layout))); - DMERR(" New layout: %s w/ %d copies", - raid10_md_layout_to_format(mddev->layout), - raid10_md_layout_to_copies(mddev->layout)); - return -EINVAL; - } - if (le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors) != mddev->new_chunk_sectors) { - DMERR("Reshaping raid sets not yet supported. (stripe sectors change)"); - return -EINVAL; - } + struct raid_type *rt_cur = get_raid_type_by_ll(mddev->level, mddev->layout); + struct raid_type *rt_new = get_raid_type_by_ll(mddev->new_level, mddev->new_layout); - /* We can only change the number of devices in raid1 with old (i.e. pre 1.0.7) metadata */ - if (!rt_is_raid1(rs->raid_type) && - (le32_to_cpu(sb->num_devices) != mddev->raid_disks)) { - DMERR("Reshaping raid sets not yet supported. (device count change from %u to %u)", - sb->num_devices, mddev->raid_disks); + if (rs_takeover_requested(rs)) { + if (rt_cur && rt_new) + DMERR("Takeover raid sets from %s to %s not yet supported by metadata. (raid level change)", + rt_cur->name, rt_new->name); + else + DMERR("Takeover raid sets not yet supported by metadata. (raid level change)"); + return -EINVAL; + } else if (rs_reshape_requested(rs)) { + DMERR("Reshaping raid sets not yet supported by metadata. (raid layout change keeping level)"); + if (mddev->layout != mddev->new_layout) { + if (rt_cur && rt_new) + DMERR(" current layout %s vs new layout %s", + rt_cur->name, rt_new->name); + else + DMERR(" current layout 0x%X vs new layout 0x%X", + le32_to_cpu(sb->layout), mddev->new_layout); + } + if (mddev->chunk_sectors != mddev->new_chunk_sectors) + DMERR(" current stripe sectors %u vs new stripe sectors %u", + mddev->chunk_sectors, mddev->new_chunk_sectors); + if (rs->delta_disks) + DMERR(" current %u disks vs new %u disks", + mddev->raid_disks, mddev->raid_disks + rs->delta_disks); + if (rs_is_raid10(rs)) { + DMERR(" Old layout: %s w/ %u copies", + raid10_md_layout_to_format(mddev->layout), + raid10_md_layout_to_copies(mddev->layout)); + DMERR(" New layout: %s w/ %u copies", + raid10_md_layout_to_format(mddev->new_layout), + raid10_md_layout_to_copies(mddev->new_layout)); + } return -EINVAL; } DMINFO("Discovered old metadata format; upgrading to extended metadata format"); - - /* Table line is checked vs. authoritative superblock */ - rs_set_new(rs); } if (!test_bit(__CTR_FLAG_NOSYNC, &rs->ctr_flags)) @@ -2211,7 +2218,7 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct raid_set *rs, struct md_rdev *rdev) continue; if (role != r->raid_disk) { - if (__is_raid10_near(mddev->layout)) { + if (rs_is_raid10(rs) && __is_raid10_near(mddev->layout)) { if (mddev->raid_disks % __raid10_near_copies(mddev->layout) || rs->raid_disks % rs->raid10_copies) { rs->ti->error = -- 2.11.0