From 465e7baab6d93b399344f5868f84c177ab5cd16f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maor Gottlieb Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:42:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Fix deletion of duplicate rules When a rule is duplicated, the refcount of the rule is increased so only the second deletion of the rule should cause destruction of the FTE. Currently, the FTE will be destroyed in the first deletion of rule since the modify_mask will be 0. Fix it and call to destroy FTE only if all the rules (FTE's children) have been removed. Fixes: 718ce4d601db ("net/mlx5: Consolidate update FTE for all removal changes") Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c index 16091838bfcf..325a5b0d6829 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c @@ -2010,10 +2010,11 @@ void mlx5_del_flow_rules(struct mlx5_flow_handle *handle) down_write_ref_node(&fte->node, false); for (i = handle->num_rules - 1; i >= 0; i--) tree_remove_node(&handle->rule[i]->node, true); - if (fte->modify_mask && fte->dests_size) { - modify_fte(fte); + if (fte->dests_size) { + if (fte->modify_mask) + modify_fte(fte); up_write_ref_node(&fte->node, false); - } else { + } else if (list_empty(&fte->node.children)) { del_hw_fte(&fte->node); /* Avoid double call to del_hw_fte */ fte->node.del_hw_func = NULL; -- 2.11.0