From 46b86431f7c40c9c016af956c031885c34410161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: teawater Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:11:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 2009-09-28 Hui Zhu * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Remove "0x" that don't need. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/i386-tdep.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index be6239fe6d..f68766938a 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2009-09-28 Hui Zhu + + * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Remove "0x" that + don't need. + 2009-09-27 Ulrich Weigand * s390-tdep.c (op_bctr, op_bctgr, op_bct, op1_bctg, op2_bctg, diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c index ab628c41f0..b79bcd29be 100644 --- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c @@ -4043,7 +4043,7 @@ reswitch: if (ir.override >= 0) { warning (_("Process record ignores the memory change " - "of instruction at address 0x%s because " + "of instruction at address %s because " "it can't get the value of the segment " "register."), paddress (gdbarch, ir.orig_addr)); @@ -4468,7 +4468,7 @@ reswitch: { /* addr += ((uint32_t) read_register (I386_ES_REGNUM)) << 4; */ warning (_("Process record ignores the memory " - "change of instruction at address 0x%s " + "change of instruction at address %s " "because it can't get the value of the " "ES segment register."), paddress (gdbarch, ir.orig_addr)); -- 2.11.0