From 5afac727defa0b2a3dffb2abd5fb5f594b98d217 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Zaidman Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 23:11:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] HID: ft260: missed NACK from busy device When writing into a slow device like an EEPROM chip, the controller may exit the busy state before the device releases the bus. In this case, the ft260_xfer_status returns success before the data transfer completion. The patch fixes it by returning from the ft260_xfer_status() with the "-EAGAIN" on both controller and bus busy status when appropriate. It does not apply to the i2c combined transactions when after the write IO, the controller keeps the bus busy until the read IO and then between reading IOs to ensure an atomic operation. Co-developed-by: Germain Hebert Signed-off-by: Germain Hebert Signed-off-by: Michael Zaidman Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina --- drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c b/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c index b4f180c8750a..d5b092b85d7f 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int ft260_i2c_reset(struct hid_device *hdev) return ret; } -static int ft260_xfer_status(struct ft260_device *dev) +static int ft260_xfer_status(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 bus_busy) { struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; struct ft260_get_i2c_status_report report; @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int ft260_xfer_status(struct ft260_device *dev) ft260_dbg("bus_status %#02x, clock %u\n", report.bus_status, dev->clock); - if (report.bus_status & FT260_I2C_STATUS_CTRL_BUSY) + if (report.bus_status & (FT260_I2C_STATUS_CTRL_BUSY | bus_busy)) return -EAGAIN; /* @@ -369,8 +369,11 @@ static int ft260_hid_output_report(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *data, static int ft260_hid_output_report_check_status(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 *data, int len) { + u8 bus_busy; int ret, usec, try = 100; struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; + struct ft260_i2c_write_request_report *rep = + (struct ft260_i2c_write_request_report *)data; ret = ft260_hid_output_report(hdev, data, len); if (ret < 0) { @@ -388,8 +391,18 @@ static int ft260_hid_output_report_check_status(struct ft260_device *dev, ft260_dbg("wait %d usec, len %d\n", usec, len); } + /* + * Do not check the busy bit for combined transactions + * since the controller keeps the bus busy between writing + * and reading IOs to ensure an atomic operation. + */ + if (rep->flag == FT260_FLAG_START) + bus_busy = 0; + else + bus_busy = FT260_I2C_STATUS_BUS_BUSY; + do { - ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev); + ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev, bus_busy); if (ret != -EAGAIN) break; } while (--try); @@ -488,6 +501,7 @@ static int ft260_i2c_read(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 addr, u8 *data, int timeout, ret = 0; struct ft260_i2c_read_request_report rep; struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; + u8 bus_busy = 0; if ((flag & FT260_FLAG_START_REPEATED) == FT260_FLAG_START_REPEATED) flag = FT260_FLAG_START_REPEATED; @@ -531,7 +545,10 @@ static int ft260_i2c_read(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 addr, u8 *data, dev->read_buf = NULL; - ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev); + if (flag & FT260_FLAG_STOP) + bus_busy = FT260_I2C_STATUS_BUS_BUSY; + + ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev, bus_busy); if (ret < 0) { ret = -EIO; ft260_i2c_reset(hdev); @@ -1003,7 +1020,7 @@ static int ft260_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id) mutex_init(&dev->lock); init_completion(&dev->wait); - ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev); + ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev, FT260_I2C_STATUS_BUS_BUSY); if (ret) ft260_i2c_reset(hdev); -- 2.11.0