From 61d03862734360aad470019f160d484403a3923e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:12:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm_pmu: fix event CPU filtering Janne reports that perf has been broken on Apple M1 as of commit: bd27568117664b8b ("perf: Rewrite core context handling") That commit replaced the pmu::filter_match() callback with pmu::filter(), whose return value has the opposite polarity, with true implying events should be ignored rather than scheduled. While an attempt was made to update the logic in armv8pmu_filter() and armpmu_filter() accordingly, the return value remains inverted in a couple of cases: * If the arm_pmu does not have an arm_pmu::filter() callback, armpmu_filter() will always return whether the CPU is supported rather than whether the CPU is not supported. As a result, the perf core will not schedule events on supported CPUs, resulting in a loss of events. Additionally, the perf core will attempt to schedule events on unsupported CPUs, but this will be rejected by armpmu_add(), which may result in a loss of events from other PMUs on those unsupported CPUs. * If the arm_pmu does have an arm_pmu::filter() callback, and armpmu_filter() is called on a CPU which is not supported by the arm_pmu, armpmu_filter() will return false rather than true. As a result, the perf core will attempt to schedule events on unsupported CPUs, but this will be rejected by armpmu_add(), which may result in a loss of events from other PMUs on those unsupported CPUs. This means a loss of events can be seen with any arm_pmu driver, but with the ARMv8 PMUv3 driver (which is the only arm_pmu driver with an arm_pmu::filter() callback) the event loss will be more limited and may go unnoticed, which is how this issue evaded testing so far. Fix the CPU filtering by performing this consistently in armpmu_filter(), and remove the redundant arm_pmu::filter() callback and armv8pmu_filter() implementation. Commit bd2756811766 also silently removed the CHAIN event filtering from armv8pmu_filter(), which will be addressed by a separate patch without using the filter callback. Fixes: bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling") Reported-by: Janne Grunau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/asahi/20230215-arm_pmu_m1_regression-v1-1-f5a266577c8d@jannau.net/ Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Asahi Lina Cc: Eric Curtin Tested-by: Janne Grunau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230216141240.3833272-2-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 7 ------- drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 8 +------- include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c index a5193f2146a6..3e43538f6b72 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -1023,12 +1023,6 @@ static int armv8pmu_set_event_filter(struct hw_perf_event *event, return 0; } -static bool armv8pmu_filter(struct pmu *pmu, int cpu) -{ - struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu); - return !cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->supported_cpus); -} - static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info) { struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = (struct arm_pmu *)info; @@ -1258,7 +1252,6 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, char *name, cpu_pmu->stop = armv8pmu_stop; cpu_pmu->reset = armv8pmu_reset; cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv8pmu_set_event_filter; - cpu_pmu->filter = armv8pmu_filter; cpu_pmu->pmu.event_idx = armv8pmu_user_event_idx; diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c index 9b593f985805..40f70f83daba 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c @@ -550,13 +550,7 @@ static void armpmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu) static bool armpmu_filter(struct pmu *pmu, int cpu) { struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu); - bool ret; - - ret = cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus); - if (ret && armpmu->filter) - return armpmu->filter(pmu, cpu); - - return ret; + return !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus); } static ssize_t cpus_show(struct device *dev, diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h index ef914a600087..525b5d64e394 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ struct arm_pmu { void (*stop)(struct arm_pmu *); void (*reset)(void *); int (*map_event)(struct perf_event *event); - bool (*filter)(struct pmu *pmu, int cpu); int num_events; bool secure_access; /* 32-bit ARM only */ #define ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS 0x40 -- 2.11.0