From 694cea395fded425008e93cd90cfdf7a451674af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:05:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit XDP programs are called from a NAPI poll context, which means the RCU reference liveness is ensured by local_bh_disable(). Add rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as a condition to the RCU checks for map lookups so lockdep understands that the dereferences are safe from inside *either* an rcu_read_lock() section *or* a local_bh_disable() section. While both bh_disabled and rcu_read_lock() provide RCU protection, they are semantically distinct, so we need both conditions to prevent lockdep complaints. This change is done in preparation for removing the redundant rcu_read_lock()s from drivers. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210624160609.292325-5-toke@redhat.com --- kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 6 +++--- kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c index 6f6681b07364..72c58cc516a3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -596,7 +596,8 @@ static void *__htab_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key) struct htab_elem *l; u32 hash, key_size; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; @@ -989,7 +990,8 @@ static int htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, /* unknown flags */ return -EINVAL; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; @@ -1082,7 +1084,8 @@ static int htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, /* unknown flags */ return -EINVAL; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; @@ -1148,7 +1151,8 @@ static int __htab_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, /* unknown flags */ return -EINVAL; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; @@ -1202,7 +1206,8 @@ static int __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, /* unknown flags */ return -EINVAL; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; @@ -1276,7 +1281,8 @@ static int htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key) u32 hash, key_size; int ret; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; @@ -1311,7 +1317,8 @@ static int htab_lru_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key) u32 hash, key_size; int ret; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() && + !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); key_size = map->key_size; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index a2f1f15ce432..62cf00383910 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ */ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key); } @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = { BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key, void *, value, u64, flags) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags); } @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = { BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c index 1b7b8a6f34ee..423549d2c52e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ static void *trie_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key) /* Start walking the trie from the root node ... */ - for (node = rcu_dereference(trie->root); node;) { + for (node = rcu_dereference_check(trie->root, rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); + node;) { unsigned int next_bit; size_t matchlen; @@ -264,7 +265,8 @@ static void *trie_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key) * traverse down. */ next_bit = extract_bit(key->data, node->prefixlen); - node = rcu_dereference(node->child[next_bit]); + node = rcu_dereference_check(node->child[next_bit], + rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); } if (!found) -- 2.11.0